Geneo Logo
Geneo

wearable ECG accuracy studies

Analyzed across ChatGPT, Perplexity & Google AIO
Analyzed 11/15/2025

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

📨Report will be sent to your email within 1 minute

Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
All 5 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
Apple Watch
9
0
Sentiment:
Score:95
Fitbit
2
0
Sentiment:
Score:62
Samsung Galaxy Watch
1
0
Sentiment:
Score:61
4Garmin
3
0
Sentiment:
Score:57
5Polar
1
0
Sentiment:
Score:55
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 19 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
#1pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov faviconpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
2
Google AIO:
5
7
#2acc.org faviconacc.org
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
3
#3ccjm.org faviconccjm.org
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#4sciencedirect.com faviconsciencedirect.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
2
2
#5mdpi.com faviconmdpi.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

3542 Characters

BRAND (6)

精选行业Query
Apple Watch
Samsung Galaxy Watch
Garmin
Fitbit
Polar

SUMMARY

ChatGPT provides a structured educational overview of wearable ECG accuracy studies, focusing primarily on atrial fibrillation detection. It highlights specific research findings, including the Apple Watch Heart app's 84% accuracy in a large-scale study of 420,000 participants, and mentions systematic reviews showing ECG-based chest patches achieving 96.1% sensitivity and 97.5% specificity for AF detection.

Perplexity

1997 Characters

BRAND (6)

精选行业Query
Apple Watch
Samsung Galaxy Watch
Garmin
Fitbit
Polar

SUMMARY

Perplexity delivers an analytical breakdown of wearable ECG accuracy across different device categories. It provides detailed statistical data, comparing ECG smart chest patches (96.1% sensitivity, 97.5% specificity) with smartwatch ECGs (86% algorithmic sensitivity, 94% specificity, improving to 96% with manual reading). The response emphasizes how accuracy varies by device type, algorithm, and patient population.

Google AIO

672 Characters

BRAND (6)

精选行业Query
Apple Watch
Samsung Galaxy Watch
Garmin
Fitbit
Polar

SUMMARY

Google AIO offers a comprehensive overview that balances positive findings with important limitations. It confirms high accuracy for atrial fibrillation detection (above 90% sensitivity for Apple Watch and Samsung Galaxy Watch) while noting significant challenges including inconclusive readings requiring manual review and reduced accuracy for conditions beyond AF, such as complex arrhythmias or myocardial infarction.

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

Apple Watch emerges as the most frequently mentioned and studied brand across all platforms, with specific accuracy data and large-scale research validation.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT focuses on educational presentation with specific study citations, Perplexity emphasizes statistical analysis and device categorization, while Google AIO provides the most balanced view including limitations and future outlook.

Link Opportunity

All platforms provide substantial link opportunities with ChatGPT offering 7 links, Google AIO providing 12 links, and Perplexity including 10 links to research studies and medical publications.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

Wearable ECG devices demonstrate consistently high accuracy for atrial fibrillation detection, with most studies showing sensitivity and specificity above 90%.

ECG chest patches generally outperform smartwatches in accuracy metrics, achieving sensitivity around 96% compared to smartwatch algorithmic detection at 86%.

Manual interpretation by medical professionals significantly improves smartwatch ECG accuracy compared to automated algorithmic analysis.

Current wearable ECG technology shows limitations for detecting complex arrhythmias and conditions beyond atrial fibrillation, indicating areas for future development.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media