Geneo Logo
Geneo

occupancy sensor accuracy IoT

Analyzed across ChatGPT, Perplexity & Google AIO
Analyzed 11/15/2025

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

📨Report will be sent to your email within 1 minute

Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
All 4 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
Milesight
3
2
Sentiment:
Score:95
EcoStruxure
0
2
Sentiment:
Score:65
Square Sense
0
1
Sentiment:
Score:55
4Occuspace
0
1
Sentiment:
Score:55
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 15 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
#1mdpi.com faviconmdpi.com
ChatGPT:
3
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
3
#2sciencedirect.com faviconsciencedirect.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
3
3
#3arxiv.org faviconarxiv.org
ChatGPT:
2
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
2
#4youtube.com faviconyoutube.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
2
2
#5milesight.com faviconmilesight.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
2

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

3883 Characters

BRAND (5)

精选行业Query
Milesight
Square Sense
EcoStruxure
Occuspace

SUMMARY

ChatGPT provides a technical breakdown of occupancy sensor technologies, focusing on specific accuracy ranges for PIR sensors (77.8% to 94.3%) and mentioning Time-of-Flight sensors. The response emphasizes how environmental factors and sensor placement affect performance, with detailed technical specifications and research-backed data.

Perplexity

2214 Characters

BRAND (5)

精选行业Query
Milesight
Square Sense
EcoStruxure
Occuspace

SUMMARY

Perplexity offers comprehensive accuracy figures across multiple sensor technologies, highlighting that modern IoT occupancy sensors achieve 95-98% accuracy generally, with millimeter wave radar reaching up to 99%. The response covers Wi-Fi/BLE sensors, radar technology, and discusses factors that can impact accuracy in real-world deployments.

Google AIO

673 Characters

BRAND (5)

精选行业Query
Milesight
Square Sense
EcoStruxure
Occuspace

SUMMARY

Google AIO takes an analytical approach, emphasizing that high-performance systems can achieve over 99.5% accuracy through advanced AI and data fusion techniques. The response focuses on improvement methods using machine learning algorithms like ANNs and Random Forest, while acknowledging environmental interference factors.

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

Only Milesight appears as a mentioned brand across platforms, though with minimal presence, indicating a fragmented market without clear dominant players.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT focuses on technical specifications and research data, Perplexity emphasizes practical accuracy ranges, while Google AIO highlights AI-driven improvement methods.

Link Opportunity

All platforms provide substantial external links (4-11 per response), suggesting strong opportunities for authoritative content and research citations in this technical domain.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

Occupancy sensor accuracy varies significantly by technology type, ranging from 77% to over 99% depending on the implementation.

Advanced AI and machine learning algorithms can substantially improve sensor accuracy beyond traditional methods.

Environmental factors and sensor placement are critical determinants of real-world performance across all sensor types.

The market shows limited brand dominance, presenting opportunities for companies to establish thought leadership in IoT occupancy sensing.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media