micro-influencer vs macro influencer ROI
AI Search Visibility Analysis
Analyze how brands appear across multiple AI search platforms for a specific prompt
Total Mentions
Total number of times a brand appears
across all AI platforms for this prompt
Platform Presence
Number of AI platforms where the brand
was mentioned for this prompt
Linkbacks
Number of times brand website was
linked in AI responses
Sentiment
Overall emotional tone when brand is
mentioned (Positive/Neutral/Negative)
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
Strategic Insights & Recommendations
Dominant Brand
No specific brands were prominently featured across the responses, as the content focused on influencer marketing strategies and ROI comparisons rather than brand recommendations.
Platform Gap
All platforms consistently agreed that micro-influencers deliver superior ROI, with Perplexity providing the most detailed statistical analysis while ChatGPT offered more strategic context.
Link Opportunity
Multiple specialized influencer marketing platforms and research sources were referenced, indicating opportunities for partnerships with influencer marketing tools and analytics providers.
Key Takeaways for This Prompt
Micro-influencers deliver 60% higher conversion rates and 40% lower cost per engagement than macro-influencers.
Engagement rates for micro-influencers range from 3.86% to 20%, significantly higher than macro-influencers' 1.21% to 5%.
Cost per post for micro-influencers ($300-500) is substantially lower than macro-influencers ($1,000-5,000+).
The authentic relationships micro-influencers maintain with their audiences drive higher trust and purchase intent.
AI Search Engine Responses
Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query
ChatGPT
SUMMARY
Micro-influencers (10K-100K followers) deliver superior ROI compared to macro-influencers through higher engagement rates (5-20% vs 1-3%), lower costs ($300-500 vs $1K-5K per post), and 60% higher conversion rates. Their authentic audience relationships foster trust, resulting in 40% cost savings per engagement ($0.20 vs $0.33). While macro-influencers offer broader reach for brand awareness, micro-influencers excel in targeted campaigns focused on engagement and conversions.
REFERENCES (4)
Perplexity
SUMMARY
Micro-influencers (10K-100K followers) significantly outperform macro-influencers in ROI metrics. They achieve 3.86% engagement rates versus 1.21% for macros, generate 20% higher conversion rates, and cost 40% less per engagement ($0.20 vs $0.33). Nano-influencers convert 7% of engagements to sales compared to 3% for macros. The authentic, personal relationships micro-influencers maintain with their audiences drive superior purchase intent and marketing effectiveness, making them the preferred choice for cost-efficient, high-converting campaigns.
REFERENCES (8)
Google AIO
SUMMARY
Micro-influencers generally provide better ROI than macro-influencers due to higher engagement rates, lower costs, and stronger audience trust. They offer more targeted, niche-focused audiences with authentic connections, leading to higher conversion rates. While macro-influencers provide wider reach and visibility, their higher fees and lower engagement rates can impact overall ROI. Research shows nano-influencers deliver over three times the ROI of macro-influencers, making smaller influencers more cost-effective for most brands.
REFERENCES (19)
Share Report
Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media