Geneo Logo
Geneo

micro-influencer vs macro influencer ROI

Analyzed across ChatGPT, Perplexity & Google AIO
Analyzed 11/15/2025

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

📨Report will be sent to your email within 1 minute

Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
All 22 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
youflu
6
1
Sentiment:
Score:95
Stack Influence
2
2
Sentiment:
Score:76
Medianug
2
2
Sentiment:
Score:76
4Trend
0
2
Sentiment:
Score:62
5MIT Sloan Review
0
2
Sentiment:
Score:62
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 22 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
#1trend.io favicontrend.io
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#2kicksta.co faviconkicksta.co
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#3medianug.com faviconmedianug.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
2
#4stackinfluence.com faviconstackinfluence.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
2
#5creativeformore.com faviconcreativeformore.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

2850 Characters

BRAND (23)

精选行业Query
LinkedIn
Stack Influence
Trend
MIT Sloan Review
Influentially
Harvard Business Review
Impact
American Marketing Association
marketingprofs
GetSaral
Klear
Socially Powerful
Tanke
ThunderTech
youflu
emplicit
hireinfluence
Creative For More
Kicksta
Medianug
Sink or Swim Marketing
Verify Creator

SUMMARY

ChatGPT provides an educational breakdown comparing micro-influencers (10K-100K followers) and macro-influencers, focusing on engagement rates (3-7% vs 1-3%) and cost-effectiveness ($100-500 vs higher costs for macro-influencers). The response emphasizes that higher engagement rates from micro-influencers typically lead to better conversion rates and ROI, making them more attractive for brands seeking authentic audience connections.

Perplexity

4058 Characters

BRAND (23)

精选行业Query
LinkedIn
Stack Influence
Trend
MIT Sloan Review
Influentially
Harvard Business Review
Impact
American Marketing Association
marketingprofs
GetSaral
Klear
Socially Powerful
Tanke
ThunderTech
youflu
emplicit
hireinfluence
Creative For More
Kicksta
Medianug
Sink or Swim Marketing
Verify Creator

SUMMARY

Perplexity delivers a comprehensive analytical comparison with specific ROI metrics, showing micro-influencers generate 20:1 ROI compared to macro-influencers' 6:1 ROI. The response includes detailed performance data, citing that businesses earn $5.78-$18 per dollar spent with micro-influencers, and notes that nano-influencers perform even better with three times the ROI of macro-influencers.

Google AIO

576 Characters

BRAND (23)

精选行业Query
LinkedIn
Stack Influence
Trend
MIT Sloan Review
Influentially
Harvard Business Review
Impact
American Marketing Association
marketingprofs
GetSaral
Klear
Socially Powerful
Tanke
ThunderTech
youflu
emplicit
hireinfluence
Creative For More
Kicksta
Medianug
Sink or Swim Marketing
Verify Creator

SUMMARY

Google AIO presents a balanced comparative analysis highlighting that micro-influencers excel in sales-driven campaigns due to authentic connections and better engagement rates, while macro-influencers are superior for large-scale awareness campaigns. The response emphasizes cost-effectiveness per engagement for micro-influencers versus better CPM for macro-influencers, recommending a hybrid approach.

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

No specific brands dominate the responses, with youflu being the only platform mentioned as a source in ChatGPT's response.

Platform Gap

Perplexity provides the most data-driven analysis with specific ROI ratios, while ChatGPT focuses on educational fundamentals and Google AIO emphasizes strategic balance.

Link Opportunity

All platforms provide substantial link opportunities with Google AIO leading at 11 links, followed by Perplexity at 14 links, and ChatGPT at 3 links.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

Micro-influencers consistently deliver higher ROI across all platforms, with Perplexity citing 20:1 returns versus 6:1 for macro-influencers.

Engagement rates are significantly higher for micro-influencers (3-7%) compared to macro-influencers (1-3%), leading to better conversion potential.

Cost-effectiveness favors micro-influencers for sales-driven campaigns, while macro-influencers excel in awareness campaigns with better reach.

A hybrid approach combining both influencer types is recommended to maximize campaign effectiveness across different marketing objectives.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media