Geneo Logo
Geneo

how to remove PFAS from water

informationalHealthcare & WellnessAnalyzed 06/10/2025

AI Search Visibility Analysis

Analyze how brands appear across multiple AI search platforms for a specific prompt

Prompt Report Analysis Visualization
High Impact

Total Mentions

Total number of times a brand appears

across all AI platforms for this prompt

Reach

Platform Presence

Number of AI platforms where the brand

was mentioned for this prompt

Authority

Linkbacks

Number of times brand website was

linked in AI responses

Reputation

Sentiment

Overall emotional tone when brand is

mentioned (Positive/Neutral/Negative)

Brand Performance Across AI Platforms

2
Platforms Covered
4
Brands Found
8
Total Mentions
BRANDTOTAL MENTIONSPLATFORM PRESENCELINKBACKSSENTIMENTSCORE
1Gradiant
3
0
95
2NSF
3
0
95
3WQA
1
0
55
4IAPMO
1
0
55
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 12 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
2
Google AIO:
0
2
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

No specific brands are prominently featured across the responses, with focus on treatment technologies rather than commercial products.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT provides more technical depth on treatment mechanisms while Perplexity focuses on practical consumer guidance and certification standards.

Link Opportunity

Both platforms reference EPA resources extensively, creating opportunities for authoritative content linking to government treatment guidelines.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

Granular activated carbon and reverse osmosis are the most effective proven methods for PFAS removal from water

Home filtration systems should be certified by NSF, WQA, or IAPMO specifically for PFAS removal to ensure effectiveness

Reverse osmosis systems can achieve over 90% PFAS removal but require regular maintenance and are energy-intensive

Emerging destructive technologies aim to completely break down PFAS molecules rather than just removing them from water

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

3510 Characters

BRAND (1)

Gradiant

SUMMARY

ChatGPT provides a comprehensive overview of PFAS removal methods including granular activated carbon (GAC), ion exchange resins, high-pressure membranes like reverse osmosis, and advanced oxidation processes. It highlights the effectiveness of each method for different PFAS types, noting that GAC works best for long-chain PFAS while reverse osmosis achieves over 90% removal. The response also mentions emerging technologies like Gradiant's ForeverGone system that uses microbubbles and electrodes for total PFAS destruction.

Perplexity

2522 Characters

BRAND (3)

NSF
WQA
IAPMO

SUMMARY

Perplexity focuses on practical solutions for consumers, emphasizing certified water filtration devices for home use. It recommends looking for NSF/ANSI certifications and highlights that consumer-grade filters with GAC or reverse osmosis can achieve over 90% PFAS removal. The response covers three main treatment technologies (GAC, RO, anion exchange) and mentions emerging destructive methods like electrochemical oxidation. It emphasizes the importance of proper maintenance and notes that common treatments like water softeners don't remove PFAS.

Google AIO

0 Characters

SUMMARY

No summary available.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media

How to Remove PFAS from Water: Effective Treatment Methods | Geneo