Geneo Logo
Geneo
AI Visibility Report
01/14/2026
Live Analysis:
ChatGPT_

AI Visibility Report for
fitnesstrackeraccuracyheartrate

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

Free Report
No Signup
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
All 11 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
Apple
10
0
Sentiment:
Score:95
Garmin
8
0
Sentiment:
Score:87
Masimo
3
0
Sentiment:
Score:66
4Fitbit
2
0
Sentiment:
Score:61
5Coospo
2
0
Sentiment:
Score:61
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 15 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
#1bipr.fr faviconbipr.fr
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#2wellnesspulse.com faviconwellnesspulse.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#3pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov faviconpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
2
2
#4time.com favicontime.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1
#5yahoo.com faviconyahoo.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

3522 Characters

BRAND (11)

Apple
Samsung
Amazfit
Pixel
WHOOP
Garmin
Fitbit
Polar
Masimo
Coospo
Fitcare

SUMMARY

ChatGPT provides an educational overview of fitness tracker heart rate accuracy, citing a Stanford University study that found most devices achieve within 5% error margin compared to medical-grade equipment. The response highlights Apple Watch's superior 2% error rate versus Samsung Gear S2's 6.8% rate, establishing a foundation for understanding general accuracy expectations across different brands and usage scenarios.

Perplexity

2497 Characters

BRAND (11)

Apple
Samsung
Amazfit
Pixel
WHOOP
Garmin
Fitbit
Polar
Masimo
Coospo
Fitcare

SUMMARY

Perplexity delivers a data-driven analysis with specific accuracy percentages, noting that fitness trackers average 76% accuracy overall. The response emphasizes Apple Watch's leadership with 86.31% accuracy and error rates as low as 1.3-2.4%, while positioning Fitbit at 73.56% accuracy. The analysis includes comparative performance data and acknowledges chest straps as the gold standard for precision.

Google AIO

1914 Characters

BRAND (11)

Apple
Samsung
Amazfit
Pixel
WHOOP
Garmin
Fitbit
Polar
Masimo
Coospo
Fitcare

SUMMARY

Google AIO provides a technical assessment focusing on performance variables and limitations. The response explains that accuracy varies significantly based on activity intensity, with better performance during steady-state exercise versus high-intensity intervals. It emphasizes practical factors like device fit, skin temperature, and movement type while noting that Apple and Garmin typically perform well among wrist-based options.

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

Apple Watch emerges as the clear leader across all platforms, consistently cited for superior accuracy and performance in heart rate monitoring.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT focuses on general education, Perplexity provides specific accuracy data and rankings, while Google AIO emphasizes technical limitations and usage factors.

Link Opportunity

All platforms reference external studies and sources, creating opportunities for authoritative content linking to research institutions and testing methodologies.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

Apple Watch consistently ranks as the most accurate wrist-based fitness tracker across all platform analyses.

Fitness tracker accuracy varies significantly based on activity intensity, with better performance during steady exercise.

Chest straps remain the gold standard for heart rate accuracy, especially during high-intensity workouts.

Device fit, skin temperature, and movement type are critical factors affecting heart rate measurement precision.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media