Geneo Logo
Geneo

airline SAF surcharge calculation

Analyzed across ChatGPT, Perplexity & Google AIO
Analyzed 11/15/2025

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

📨Report will be sent to your email within 1 minute

Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
All 5 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
KLM
3
2
Sentiment:
Score:95
Lufthansa
4
1
Sentiment:
Score:93
Maersk
1
1
Sentiment:
Score:66
4Swiss WorldCargo
1
0
Sentiment:
Score:55
5MSC Air Cargo
1
0
Sentiment:
Score:55
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 24 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
#1geodis.com favicongeodis.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
2
Google AIO:
0
2
#2klm.com faviconklm.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
#3msc.com faviconmsc.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1
#4rmi.org faviconrmi.org
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
#5iata.org faviconiata.org
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

2082 Characters

BRAND (5)

Maersk
Lufthansa
KLM
Swiss WorldCargo
MSC Air Cargo

SUMMARY

Provides a structured explanation of SAF surcharge calculations with specific examples from Lufthansa Group and KLM. Focuses on practical implementation details, including Lufthansa's Environmental Cost Surcharge ranging from €1 to €72 and KLM's doubled surcharge of €2–€24. Emphasizes the regulatory drivers and varying factors like flight distance and aircraft type that influence surcharge amounts.

Perplexity

3342 Characters

BRAND (5)

Maersk
Lufthansa
KLM
Swiss WorldCargo
MSC Air Cargo

SUMMARY

Delivers a technical breakdown of SAF surcharge methodology, emphasizing the price premium calculation between SAF and conventional jet fuel. Explains key calculation factors including fuel consumption per flight, aircraft specifications, booking class considerations, and regulatory blend mandates. References EU ReFuelEU Aviation regulation requirements with specific percentage targets from 2% in 2025 to 70% by 2050.

Google AIO

658 Characters

BRAND (5)

Maersk
Lufthansa
KLM
Swiss WorldCargo
MSC Air Cargo

SUMMARY

Offers a comprehensive overview covering multiple calculation approaches used by different airlines. Explains that surcharges are based on SAF cost premiums compared to traditional jet fuel, with methods varying from Lufthansa's CO2-based formulas considering booking class and aircraft type to flat fees or percentage-based approaches. Highlights market price dependencies and feedstock cost factors.

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

Lufthansa emerges as the most prominently featured airline across platforms, with detailed coverage of its Environmental Cost Surcharge implementation and calculation methodology.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT provides specific pricing examples, Perplexity focuses on regulatory compliance details, while Google AIO offers broader methodological comparisons across airlines.

Link Opportunity

All platforms reference external sources extensively, with Perplexity providing the most comprehensive citation network for regulatory and industry information.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

SAF surcharges are calculated based on the price premium between sustainable and conventional jet fuel.

Calculation methods vary significantly between airlines, from flat fees to complex CO2-based formulas.

EU regulatory mandates are driving standardization with specific blend percentage requirements through 2050.

Major European carriers like Lufthansa and KLM are leading implementation with transparent surcharge structures.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media