AI code completion for Mac
AI Search Visibility Analysis
Analyze how brands appear across multiple AI search platforms for a specific prompt
Total Mentions
Total number of times a brand appears
across all AI platforms for this prompt
Platform Presence
Number of AI platforms where the brand
was mentioned for this prompt
Linkbacks
Number of times brand website was
linked in AI responses
Sentiment
Overall emotional tone when brand is
mentioned (Positive/Neutral/Negative)
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
| BRAND | TOTAL MENTIONS | PLATFORM PRESENCE | LINKBACKS | SENTIMENT | SCORE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1Cursor | 7 | 1 | 95 | ||
2GitHub Copilot | 7 | 1 | 95 | ||
3Tabnine | 5 | 1 | 86 | ||
4Xcode | 4 | 0 | 72 | ||
5CodeNext | 4 | 1 | 69 | ||
6Supermaven | 4 | 1 | 69 | ||
7Visual Studio IntelliCode | 2 | 1 | 61 | ||
8Continue | 2 | 1 | 61 | ||
9Command-G | 3 | 0 | 59 | ||
10Ollama | 2 | 0 | 55 |
Strategic Insights & Recommendations
Dominant Brand
GitHub Copilot and Cursor emerge as the most frequently recommended AI code completion tools across platforms.
Platform Gap
Perplexity provides significantly more detailed technical analysis and comparison tables while ChatGPT offers simpler tool descriptions.
Link Opportunity
There's opportunity to create comprehensive Mac-specific AI coding tool comparisons and setup guides for self-hosted solutions.
Key Takeaways for This Prompt
Multiple AI code completion tools are available for Mac with different strengths in speed, privacy, and integration.
Cursor and Supermaven focus on Mac-native performance while GitHub Copilot offers proven reliability.
Self-hosted solutions provide privacy control but require more technical setup on Apple Silicon Macs.
Tool choice depends on workflow preferences: hosted solutions vs local models vs IDE-integrated options.
AI Search Engine Responses
Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query
ChatGPT
BRAND (6)
SUMMARY
ChatGPT recommends five AI code completion tools for Mac: GitHub Copilot (developed by GitHub and OpenAI, integrates with VS Code), Tabnine (supports 30+ languages and various IDEs), Cursor IDE (built on VS Code framework with natural language commands), CodeNext.ai (Xcode assistant with image-to-code conversion), and Command-G (Xcode integration with ChatGPT). All tools aim to enhance coding efficiency through intelligent suggestions and automation.
Perplexity
BRAND (8)
SUMMARY
Perplexity provides comprehensive analysis of AI code completion options for Mac, highlighting Cursor for natural language editing, Supermaven for speed (250ms latency), self-hosted models for privacy, GitHub Copilot for reliability, and others like Tabnine and IntelliCode. Includes detailed comparison table covering speed, privacy, customization, and integration preferences, plus notes on Apple's Xcode 16 built-in model.
REFERENCES (8)
Google AIO
SUMMARY
No summary available.
Share Report
Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media