Geneo Logo
Geneo

wearable health tech accuracy comparison

informationalHealthcare & WellnessAnalyzed 07/01/2025

AI Search Visibility Analysis

Analyze how brands appear across multiple AI search platforms for a specific prompt

Prompt Report Analysis Visualization
High Impact

Total Mentions

Total number of times a brand appears

across all AI platforms for this prompt

Reach

Platform Presence

Number of AI platforms where the brand

was mentioned for this prompt

Authority

Linkbacks

Number of times brand website was

linked in AI responses

Reputation

Sentiment

Overall emotional tone when brand is

mentioned (Positive/Neutral/Negative)

Brand Performance Across AI Platforms

3
Platforms Covered
5
Brands Found
0
Total Mentions
BRANDTOTAL MENTIONSPLATFORM PRESENCELINKBACKSSENTIMENTSCORE
1Apple Watch
0
0
95
2Fitbit
0
0
85
3Oura Ring
0
0
80
4Garmin
0
0
70
5Polar
0
0
55
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 24 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
3
3
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
2
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

Apple Watch dominates heart rate accuracy while Fitbit leads in step counting precision, with Oura Ring excelling specifically in sleep tracking applications.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT provides the most comprehensive technical analysis, while Perplexity focuses on specific accuracy percentages and Google AIO emphasizes practical limitations and user factors.

Link Opportunity

Strong opportunity to create detailed accuracy comparison guides linking to clinical studies and brand-specific performance data for different health metrics.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

Apple Watch achieves the highest heart rate monitoring accuracy with 1-7% error rates in most studies.

Fitbit devices excel in step counting accuracy but show significant variability in heart rate measurements across different models.

Energy expenditure estimation remains problematic across all wearable brands with errors often exceeding 30%.

Oura Ring leads in sleep tracking accuracy while most wearables tend to overestimate total sleep time and efficiency.

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

3635 Characters

BRAND (4)

Garmin
Fitbit
Oura Ring
Apple Watch

SUMMARY

ChatGPT provides a comprehensive analysis of wearable health tech accuracy across major brands. Apple Watch leads in heart rate monitoring (1-7% error) but overestimates energy expenditure by ~28%. Fitbit shows variable accuracy with 2.4-17% heart rate error and tends to underestimate steps. Garmin achieves ±3% heart rate accuracy 49% of the time but underestimates energy expenditure 69% of the time. Oura Ring excels in sleep tracking accuracy. The analysis emphasizes that accuracy varies significantly by device and metric, recommending clinical-grade equipment for critical health monitoring.

Perplexity

2297 Characters

BRAND (2)

Fitbit
Apple Watch

SUMMARY

Perplexity offers a metric-focused comparison with specific accuracy data. Fitbit Charge devices excel in step counting with <25% error rates. Apple Watch achieves <10% heart rate error in studies but shows limitations in clinical settings. Most wearables struggle with energy expenditure (>30% error). The analysis reveals heart rate errors up to 20% and calorie estimation errors up to 100%. Emerging applications in disease detection show promise, with wearables demonstrating potential for atrial fibrillation and COVID-19 detection.

Google AIO

2521 Characters

BRAND (5)

Garmin
Fitbit
Oura Ring
Apple Watch
Polar

SUMMARY

Google AIO presents a balanced overview of wearable accuracy limitations and factors affecting performance. Heart rate and blood oxygen show good accuracy, while energy expenditure and sleep stage detection remain challenging. Step counting typically underestimates by 9-12%. The response highlights how device type, user characteristics, and activity levels influence accuracy. Specific brand mentions include Fitbit for sleep tracking, Apple Watch for user experience, Oura Ring for sleep accuracy, Garmin for overall accuracy, and Polar H10 for heart rate precision.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media