Geneo Logo
Geneo

wearable health tech accuracy comparison

Analyzed across ChatGPT, Perplexity & Google AIO
Analyzed 11/15/2025

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

📨Report will be sent to your email within 1 minute

Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
All 9 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
Apple Watch
15
0
Sentiment:
Score:95
Garmin
10
0
Sentiment:
Score:80
Oura
9
0
Sentiment:
Score:79
4Fitbit
8
0
Sentiment:
Score:76
5WHOOP
4
0
Sentiment:
Score:68
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 16 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
#1aim7.com faviconaim7.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
2
#2geneo.app favicongeneo.app
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
2
#3androidcentral.com faviconandroidcentral.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
2
2
#4pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov faviconpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
2
Google AIO:
0
2
#5nature.com faviconnature.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

4526 Characters

BRAND (10)

精选行业Query
Samsung
Apple Watch
WHOOP
Oura
Garmin
Fitbit
TomTom
Withings
Polar

SUMMARY

Provides an educational overview of wearable health technology accuracy, focusing primarily on heart rate monitoring. Highlights the Apple Watch Ultra 2 as the most accurate consumer fitness tracker based on an independent study by Rob ter Horst from the University of Vienna. Compares it against competitors like Garmin Forerunner 570, Garmin Fenix 7, Samsung Galaxy Watch 7, and Whoop using the Polar H10 chest-mounted monitor as the gold standard reference.

Perplexity

3846 Characters

BRAND (10)

精选行业Query
Samsung
Apple Watch
WHOOP
Oura
Garmin
Fitbit
TomTom
Withings
Polar

SUMMARY

Delivers a comprehensive analysis of wearable health technology accuracy across multiple metrics. Provides specific accuracy percentages for different devices, with Apple Watch leading in heart rate monitoring at 86.31% accuracy and error rates of 1-7%. Includes detailed performance data for Fitbit devices and mentions the Apple Watch 4's superior performance at rest with just 2.7 bpm mean absolute error.

Google AIO

517 Characters

BRAND (10)

精选行业Query
Samsung
Apple Watch
WHOOP
Oura
Garmin
Fitbit
TomTom
Withings
Polar

SUMMARY

Presents a concise analytical summary with specific error percentages across different metrics and brands. Highlights Apple Watch's superior heart rate accuracy (0.91% error) while noting Garmin and Whoop's strengths in sleep and GPS accuracy respectively. Points out significant accuracy issues with step counting and caloric expenditure across multiple brands including poor performance from Garmin, Fitbit, and Withings.

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

Apple Watch emerges as the most consistently recommended brand across all platforms, particularly excelling in heart rate monitoring accuracy.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT provides more narrative context while Perplexity offers the most detailed technical specifications, and Google AIO focuses on quantitative error comparisons.

Link Opportunity

All platforms provide substantial external links (5-9 per response) indicating strong opportunities for authoritative source linking in this technical comparison space.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

Heart rate monitoring shows the highest accuracy among wearable health metrics across all devices.

Apple Watch consistently outperforms competitors in heart rate accuracy with error rates typically under 7%.

Step counting and caloric expenditure remain problematic areas with error rates exceeding 20% for many devices.

Different brands excel in specific metrics, with Garmin leading in GPS accuracy and Whoop performing well in sleep tracking.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media