Geneo Logo
Geneo

accessibility regulations WCAG 2.2 for courses

Analyzed across ChatGPT, Perplexity & Google AIO
Analyzed 11/15/2025

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

📨Report will be sent to your email within 1 minute

Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
All 12 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
W3C
0
5
Sentiment:
Score:95
udemy
2
1
Sentiment:
Score:83
Harvard Digital Accessibility
1
2
Sentiment:
Score:79
4TAMU
2
1
Sentiment:
Score:71
5Accessibility Services Canada
1
1
Sentiment:
Score:63
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 22 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
#1w3.org faviconw3.org
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
3
Google AIO:
1
5
#2youtube.com faviconyoutube.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
2
#3access-board.gov faviconaccess-board.gov
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#4accessibility.huit.harvard.edu faviconaccessibility.huit.harvard.edu
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
2
#5udemy.com faviconudemy.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

4195 Characters

BRAND (13)

精选行业Query
abilitynet
W3C
audioeye
udemy
Continual Engine
Accessible.org
Level Access
Deque University
Larmer Brown
Harvard Digital Accessibility
Accessibility Services Canada
TAMU

SUMMARY

Provides a detailed technical breakdown of WCAG 2.2 guidelines released in October 2023, focusing on specific success criteria like Focus Not Obscured and their implementation in educational environments. The response emphasizes the importance of compliance for online learning platforms and begins to detail specific navigational requirements for course developers.

Perplexity

2394 Characters

BRAND (13)

精选行业Query
abilitynet
W3C
audioeye
udemy
Continual Engine
Accessible.org
Level Access
Deque University
Larmer Brown
Harvard Digital Accessibility
Accessibility Services Canada
TAMU

SUMMARY

Offers a comprehensive overview of WCAG 2.2's nine new success criteria addressing visual, mobility, hearing, and cognitive disabilities. The response explains the four core principles (perceivable, operable, understandable, robust) and emphasizes how these guidelines specifically apply to digital learning content and course compliance requirements.

Google AIO

725 Characters

BRAND (13)

精选行业Query
abilitynet
W3C
audioeye
udemy
Continual Engine
Accessible.org
Level Access
Deque University
Larmer Brown
Harvard Digital Accessibility
Accessibility Services Canada
TAMU

SUMMARY

Presents an educational approach explaining WCAG 2.2 compliance requirements for course content, emphasizing AA conformance level as the practical standard. The response covers key compliance areas including third-party content requirements and the need for compatibility with assistive technologies like screen readers and keyboard navigation.

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

No specific brands dominate the responses, with mentions scattered across educational institutions like Harvard Digital Accessibility, TAMU, and platforms like Udemy.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT provides the most technical detail with specific success criteria, while Google AIO focuses on practical compliance levels, and Perplexity offers the broadest contextual overview.

Link Opportunity

All platforms provide substantial external linking opportunities with ChatGPT offering 7 links, Google AIO 8 links, and Perplexity leading with 14 links to authoritative sources.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

WCAG 2.2 introduces nine new success criteria specifically addressing cognitive, visual, and motor accessibility needs in digital learning environments.

AA conformance level is the practical standard for course accessibility compliance, building upon previous WCAG 2.0 and 2.1 requirements.

All course content, including third-party materials, must be compatible with assistive technologies like screen readers and keyboard navigation.

The four core principles of perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust remain the foundation for accessible course design under WCAG 2.2.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media