accessibility regulations WCAG 2.2 for courses
AI Search Visibility Analysis
Analyze how brands appear across multiple AI search platforms for a specific prompt
Total Mentions
Total number of times a brand appears
across all AI platforms for this prompt
Platform Presence
Number of AI platforms where the brand
was mentioned for this prompt
Linkbacks
Number of times brand website was
linked in AI responses
Sentiment
Overall emotional tone when brand is
mentioned (Positive/Neutral/Negative)
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
| BRAND | TOTAL MENTIONS | PLATFORM PRESENCE | LINKBACKS | SENTIMENT | SCORE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1Letoile Education | 8 | 3 | 95 | ||
2W3C | 1 | 5 | 83 | ||
3Deque University | 2 | 2 | 72 | ||
4AudioEye | 0 | 4 | 69 | ||
5Allyant | 2 | 1 | 65 | ||
6Level Access | 0 | 3 | 65 | ||
7UNC Chapel Hill | 2 | 1 | 65 | ||
8Udemy | 0 | 1 | 55 | ||
9Articulate | 0 | 1 | 55 |
Strategic Insights & Recommendations
Dominant Brand
W3C dominates as the authoritative source for WCAG 2.2 guidelines, with all platforms referencing the official W3C recommendations and documentation.
Platform Gap
ChatGPT focuses on practical implementation steps, Google AIO emphasizes the foundational POUR principles, while Perplexity provides the most technical detail on new success criteria.
Link Opportunity
Educational technology companies and accessibility training providers have significant opportunities to create WCAG 2.2 compliance tools and courses for instructional designers.
Key Takeaways for This Prompt
WCAG 2.2 introduces nine new success criteria specifically addressing cognitive disabilities, motor impairments, and low vision needs in online learning.
Level AA conformance is the most commonly required legal standard for accessibility compliance in educational institutions worldwide.
The four POUR principles (Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust) form the foundation for making courses accessible to all learners.
Regular testing with assistive technologies and user feedback from people with disabilities is essential for maintaining accessibility compliance.
AI Search Engine Responses
Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query
ChatGPT
BRAND (4)
SUMMARY
ChatGPT provides a comprehensive overview of WCAG 2.2 guidelines for online courses, focusing on seven key success criteria including non-text content alternatives, captions, audio descriptions, focus appearance, dragging movements, target size, and consistent help. The response emphasizes practical implementation through auditing existing content, designing with accessibility in mind, and regular testing with assistive technologies.
REFERENCES (6)
Perplexity
BRAND (5)
SUMMARY
Perplexity delivers a technical breakdown of WCAG 2.2's nine new success criteria specifically relevant to courses, including consistent help, pointer gestures, dragging movements, focus visibility, target size, accessible authentication, redundant entry, and accessible notifications. It provides actionable implementation steps and emphasizes Level AA conformance for legal compliance with various accessibility laws.
REFERENCES (8)
Google AIO
BRAND (7)
SUMMARY
Google AIO explains WCAG 2.2 through the four POUR principles (Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust) and three conformance levels. It covers multimedia accessibility, text and image requirements, navigation standards, form accessibility, and interactive elements. The response highlights new WCAG 2.2 criteria and mentions regulatory compliance including Section 508 and institutional adoption timelines.
REFERENCES (23)
Share Report
Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media