Geneo Logo
Geneo
AI Visibility Report
12/15/2025
Live Analysis:
ChatGPT_

AI Visibility Report for
spoliationofevidencesanctionsexamples

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

Free Report
No Signup
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
All 9 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
DuPont
2
0
Sentiment:
Score:95
QueTel Corp.
1
0
Sentiment:
Score:79
Kolon Industries
2
0
Sentiment:
Score:71
4UBS Warburg
1
0
Sentiment:
Score:55
5Zenith Electronics
1
0
Sentiment:
Score:55
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 13 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
#1mayerbrown.com faviconmayerbrown.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
2
#2en.wikipedia.org faviconen.wikipedia.org
ChatGPT:
2
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
2
#3cozen.com faviconcozen.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
#4sfbar.org faviconsfbar.org
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
#5lommen.com faviconlommen.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

2984 Characters

BRAND (9)

DuPont
UBS Warburg
Kolon Industries
QueTel Corp.
Zenith Electronics
FIE
Nuvasive
Xpert Tune
Wal-Mart

SUMMARY

Provides a clear definition of spoliation of evidence and begins listing common sanctions including adverse inference instructions and monetary sanctions. The response takes an educational approach, explaining the concept systematically with numbered points and includes a reference link to support the information.

Perplexity

3389 Characters

Google AIO

0 Characters

BRAND (9)

DuPont
UBS Warburg
Kolon Industries
QueTel Corp.
Zenith Electronics
FIE
Nuvasive
Xpert Tune
Wal-Mart

SUMMARY

No summary available.

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

DuPont, UBS Warburg, and Kolon Industries appear primarily in ChatGPT's response as case examples, while other platforms focus on general legal principles without specific company references.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT provides basic educational content while Perplexity offers more sophisticated analysis with statistical data and comprehensive categorization of sanctions.

Link Opportunity

Both platforms provide external links to support their legal information, with Perplexity offering more extensive citation support through multiple numbered references.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

Perplexity provides superior analytical depth with statistical data from Federal Judicial Center studies that ChatGPT lacks.

ChatGPT takes a more basic educational approach suitable for general audiences learning about spoliation concepts.

Both platforms emphasize adverse inference instructions as the most common sanction type in spoliation cases.

Perplexity better addresses the spectrum of sanctions and factors courts consider when determining appropriate remedies.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media