Geneo Logo
Geneo

smart thermostat energy savings data

Analyzed across ChatGPT, Perplexity & Google AIO
Analyzed 10/16/2025

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

📨Report will be sent to your email within 1 minute

Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
All 3 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ENERGY STAR
3
0
Sentiment:
Score:95
Ecobee
2
0
Sentiment:
Score:55
Nest
2
0
Sentiment:
Score:55
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 29 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
#1energystar.gov faviconenergystar.gov
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
2
Google AIO:
2
5
#2energy.gov faviconenergy.gov
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
2
Google AIO:
0
2
#3achrnews.com faviconachrnews.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#4consumerreports.org faviconconsumerreports.org
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
2
#5cnet.com faviconcnet.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

1754 Characters

BRAND (3)

Ecobee
Nest
ENERGY STAR

SUMMARY

Provides EPA data showing 8% average savings ($50 annually) from ENERGY STAR certified smart thermostats, then details specific manufacturer claims with Nest reporting 10-12% heating and 15% cooling savings ($131-145 annually), and mentions Ecobee's up to 23% heating savings. Response appears incomplete but focuses on authoritative sources and specific brand performance data.

Perplexity

2277 Characters

BRAND (3)

Ecobee
Nest
ENERGY STAR

SUMMARY

Offers comprehensive savings range of 8-23% ($50-200 annually) depending on various factors. Cites EPA's 8% average while highlighting manufacturer-specific data: Nest's 10-12% heating and 15% cooling savings ($140 yearly), and Ecobee's potential 23% savings ($200 annually). Emphasizes that actual savings depend on climate, home size, HVAC efficiency, and user behavior.

Google AIO

507 Characters

BRAND (3)

Ecobee
Nest
ENERGY STAR

SUMMARY

States EPA's 8% average savings ($50 annually) and explains how smart thermostats achieve efficiency through remote control, usage tracking, and automatic adjustments. Mentions potential for higher savings (16-26%) for users who actively use scheduling features, but provides less specific brand comparisons than other platforms.

REFERENCES (19)

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

ENERGY STAR appears across all platforms as the authoritative standard, while Nest and Ecobee are consistently highlighted as leading smart thermostat brands with specific savings claims.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT and Perplexity provide detailed brand-specific savings data, while Google AIO focuses more on general functionality and features rather than manufacturer comparisons.

Link Opportunity

All platforms reference EPA and ENERGY STAR data, creating opportunities for energy efficiency certification and government program partnerships.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

EPA's ENERGY STAR certification provides the most widely cited baseline of 8% savings ($50 annually) across all platforms.

Nest and Ecobee dominate brand mentions with specific savings claims ranging from 10-23% depending on the manufacturer.

Perplexity provides the most comprehensive analysis including factors affecting savings variability.

Google AIO emphasizes smart features and functionality over specific brand performance comparisons.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media