AI Visibility Report for “smartthermostatenergysavingsdata”
Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?
Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.
AI Search Engine Responses
Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query
ChatGPT
BRAND (4)
SUMMARY
Provides foundational energy savings data citing EPA's 8% average savings ($50/year) for ENERGY STAR certified smart thermostats, then highlights specific manufacturer claims including Ecobee's 9% heating and 12% cooling savings, and Google Nest's AI-driven 20-30% potential savings with supporting links to authoritative sources.
Perplexity
BRAND (4)
SUMMARY
Delivers detailed analysis of smart thermostat energy savings ranging from 8-20%, emphasizing ENERGY STAR's conservative 8% figure while noting independent studies commonly report 10-15% savings. Provides comprehensive context about factors affecting savings including climate, occupancy, and HVAC type with extensive citation support.
REFERENCES (6)
Google AIO
BRAND (4)
SUMMARY
Offers balanced overview starting with 8% average savings but acknowledging variation in manufacturer claims and studies showing 12-26% potential savings. Emphasizes real-world factors like usage patterns, climate, and system efficiency while noting concerns about peak demand and the need for detailed runtime analysis.
REFERENCES (12)
Strategic Insights & Recommendations
Dominant Brand
ENERGY STAR dominates across all platforms as the primary reference point for smart thermostat energy savings certification and data.
Platform Gap
Perplexity provides the most analytical depth with extensive citations, while ChatGPT focuses on clear educational content and Google AIO offers the most comprehensive real-world context.
Link Opportunity
All platforms heavily cite authoritative sources, creating opportunities for energy efficiency organizations and smart thermostat manufacturers to provide detailed case studies and independent research data.
Key Takeaways for This Prompt
All platforms consistently reference the 8% ENERGY STAR baseline for smart thermostat energy savings as a conservative estimate.
Manufacturer claims vary significantly from 8% to 30% savings, indicating opportunity for more standardized testing and reporting.
Real-world factors like climate, usage patterns, and existing HVAC efficiency significantly impact actual energy savings achieved.
Independent studies and manufacturer data often show higher savings than ENERGY STAR's conservative estimates, suggesting potential for updated benchmarks.
Share Report
Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media