smart lock security standards
Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?
Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.
AI Search Engine Responses
Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query
ChatGPT
BRAND (11)
SUMMARY
ChatGPT provides a structured educational overview of smart lock security, focusing primarily on the ANSI/BHMA grading system with three security levels (Grade 1-3). The response explains that smart locks use various entry methods like smartphones, PIN codes, and biometrics, and emphasizes the importance of choosing appropriate security grades based on application type (commercial vs residential).
REFERENCES (6)
Perplexity
BRAND (11)
SUMMARY
Perplexity delivers a comprehensive analysis of international smart lock security frameworks, highlighting ISO/IEC 15408 Common Criteria and PSA Certified standards. The response is well-structured with clear headings and provides detailed information about evaluation levels, development controls, and resistance to attack vectors, demonstrating depth in technical security assessment frameworks.
REFERENCES (8)
Google AIO
BRAND (11)
SUMMARY
Google AIO takes a technical approach, emphasizing specific security features like AES-256 encryption and practical security considerations. The response focuses on actionable security features including two-factor authentication, software updates, secure data storage, and mentions the BSI Kitemark certification as a comprehensive security assessment tool.
Strategic Insights & Recommendations
Dominant Brand
ANSI/BHMA standards dominate ChatGPT's response, while Perplexity emphasizes ISO/IEC and PSA Certified frameworks, and Google AIO highlights BSI Kitemark certification.
Platform Gap
ChatGPT focuses on traditional lock grading systems, Perplexity emphasizes international IT security frameworks, while Google AIO prioritizes practical encryption and authentication features.
Link Opportunity
Perplexity provides the most comprehensive linking opportunities with 8 links, followed by ChatGPT's 6 links, while Google AIO offers fewer but more targeted link opportunities.
Key Takeaways for This Prompt
Each platform emphasizes different security standard frameworks, creating opportunities for comprehensive coverage across traditional, international, and practical security approaches.
ChatGPT's educational style makes complex security standards accessible, while Perplexity's comprehensive approach provides technical depth for professional audiences.
Google AIO's focus on practical security features like encryption and authentication offers actionable guidance for consumers.
The variation in standards coverage across platforms suggests opportunities for content that bridges traditional lock security with modern IoT security frameworks.
Share Report
Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media