Differences between RG6 and RG11 coax cables
AI Search Visibility Analysis
Analyze how brands appear across multiple AI search platforms for a specific prompt
Total Mentions
Total number of times a brand appears
across all AI platforms for this prompt
Platform Presence
Number of AI platforms where the brand
was mentioned for this prompt
Linkbacks
Number of times brand website was
linked in AI responses
Sentiment
Overall emotional tone when brand is
mentioned (Positive/Neutral/Negative)
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
Strategic Insights & Recommendations
Dominant Brand
No specific brands were prominently featured across the platforms, with responses focusing on technical specifications and cable types rather than manufacturer recommendations.
Platform Gap
ChatGPT provided the most comprehensive technical details with specific measurements, while Google AIO offered practical installation guidance, and Perplexity excelled with comparative tables and frequency specifications.
Link Opportunity
There's an opportunity to create detailed installation guides and cable selection tools that combine the technical depth from ChatGPT with Perplexity's comparative format and Google AIO's practical recommendations.
Key Takeaways for This Prompt
RG6 cables are thinner (6.9mm), more flexible, and ideal for residential installations under 150-200 feet with lower cost and easier installation.
RG11 cables are thicker (10.3mm), have significantly lower signal loss (3.5 dB vs 6.5 dB per 100 feet at 1 GHz), and excel in long-distance runs over 150 feet.
Both cables support similar frequency ranges up to 3 GHz, but RG11 maintains better signal integrity at higher frequencies due to lower attenuation.
Installation considerations favor RG6 for tight spaces and residential use, while RG11 requires more planning due to its rigidity but offers superior performance for commercial and outdoor applications.
AI Search Engine Responses
Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query
ChatGPT
SUMMARY
ChatGPT provides a comprehensive comparison of RG6 and RG11 coaxial cables, covering physical characteristics, electrical performance, applications, and installation considerations. RG6 is smaller (6.9mm), more flexible, and ideal for residential installations up to 150 feet, while RG11 is thicker (10.3mm), has lower signal loss, and better suited for long-distance runs exceeding 150 feet. The response details specific attenuation rates, frequency ranges, and cost considerations to help users make informed decisions.
REFERENCES (4)
Perplexity
SUMMARY
Perplexity presents a detailed comparison table covering diameter, center conductor size, attenuation rates, frequency handling, and typical applications. It emphasizes that RG6 is suitable for residential use up to 200-450 meters, while RG11 excels in long-distance outdoor installations up to 400-600 meters. The response provides specific technical specifications and practical recommendations for cable selection based on distance and application requirements.
REFERENCES (7)
Google AIO
SUMMARY
Google AIO offers a concise overview of RG6 vs RG11 differences, emphasizing thickness, flexibility, and signal attenuation. It highlights that RG11 is thicker with lower signal loss over longer distances, while RG6 is more flexible for general-purpose residential applications. The response provides practical guidance on when to choose each cable type based on distance requirements and installation constraints.
REFERENCES (9)
Share Report
Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media