Differences between RG6 and RG11 coax cables
Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?
Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.
AI Search Engine Responses
Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query
ChatGPT
BRAND (15)
SUMMARY
Provides detailed technical specifications comparing RG6 and RG11 coaxial cables, focusing on physical characteristics like conductor sizes (18 AWG vs 14 AWG) and cable diameters (6.9mm vs 10.3mm). Emphasizes the technical aspects of installation flexibility and physical dimensions with specific measurements.
REFERENCES (6)
Perplexity
BRAND (15)
SUMMARY
Offers a comprehensive analysis covering multiple aspects including diameter, construction, signal loss, distance capabilities, and applications. Provides specific measurements and distance ranges (600m for RG11 vs 450m for RG6) while explaining the practical implications for different use cases.
REFERENCES (8)
Google AIO
BRAND (15)
SUMMARY
Delivers a concise comparative overview highlighting the key trade-offs between the two cable types. Focuses on practical considerations like cost-effectiveness, flexibility, and application suitability, emphasizing RG6 for residential use and RG11 for long-distance applications.
REFERENCES (4)
Strategic Insights & Recommendations
Dominant Brand
No specific cable brands are prominently featured across platforms, with responses focusing on technical specifications rather than manufacturer recommendations.
Platform Gap
ChatGPT provides the most technical detail with specific measurements, while Google AIO offers the most practical comparison, and Perplexity balances technical specs with application guidance.
Link Opportunity
There's significant opportunity for cable manufacturers and technical resource sites to provide authoritative comparison guides, as current responses rely heavily on technical specifications without strong brand positioning.
Key Takeaways for This Prompt
All platforms agree that RG11 has superior signal quality and lower loss over longer distances compared to RG6.
RG6 is consistently positioned as the more cost-effective and flexible option for residential applications.
Technical specifications like conductor size and cable diameter are emphasized across all platforms as key differentiators.
The responses show a gap in manufacturer-specific recommendations, focusing instead on general cable type characteristics.
Share Report
Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media