mental health app effectiveness studies
AI Search Visibility Analysis
Analyze how brands appear across multiple AI search platforms for a specific prompt
Total Mentions
Total number of times a brand appears
across all AI platforms for this prompt
Platform Presence
Number of AI platforms where the brand
was mentioned for this prompt
Linkbacks
Number of times brand website was
linked in AI responses
Sentiment
Overall emotional tone when brand is
mentioned (Positive/Neutral/Negative)
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
| BRAND | TOTAL MENTIONS | PLATFORM PRESENCE | LINKBACKS | SENTIMENT | SCORE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1Rejoyn | 1 | 0 | 95 | ||
2Joy | 0 | 0 | 55 |
Strategic Insights & Recommendations
Dominant Brand
No specific mental health app brands were consistently recommended across all platforms, with studies focusing on app categories rather than individual products.
Platform Gap
ChatGPT provided more historical research context, Google AIO emphasized limitations and bias concerns, while Perplexity offered the most recent 2025 studies with detailed statistical data.
Link Opportunity
Strong opportunity to link to academic journals like JMIR Mental Health, PubMed studies, and recent systematic reviews on mental health app effectiveness.
Key Takeaways for This Prompt
Mental health apps show modest but significant effectiveness for anxiety and depression symptoms according to multiple systematic reviews.
Apps with CBT-based features and interventions lasting 7+ weeks demonstrate better outcomes than shorter-term or basic monitoring apps.
High compliance rates (85-100%) indicate good user acceptance, but privacy concerns and lack of clinician support limit long-term engagement.
Most mental health apps lack rigorous clinical validation, with many studies conducted by app developers raising potential bias concerns.
AI Search Engine Responses
Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query
ChatGPT
BRAND (2)
SUMMARY
Recent studies show mental health apps have modest but significant effects on reducing anxiety and depression symptoms. A 2022 meta-analysis of 15 trials found app-based interventions effective for anxiety, especially with 7+ week durations. However, most apps lack clinical validation. A 2021 study found no difference between gamified and non-gamified apps for depression. While promising, apps need more rigorous research and better integration with traditional mental health services.
REFERENCES (7)
Perplexity
SUMMARY
Mental health apps demonstrate promising but mixed evidence across conditions. A 2025 review found self-monitoring apps reduce hospitalizations in early psychosis with high compliance rates (85-100%). Michigan Medicine study showed apps help manage symptoms while waiting for care. Meta-analyses indicate small to medium effect sizes for anxiety and depression, sustained 6-11 weeks. However, privacy concerns and lack of clinician support limit long-term engagement.
REFERENCES (6)
Google AIO
SUMMARY
Mental health apps show moderate effectiveness for depression, anxiety, and stress, but limited efficacy for psychosis and suicidal ideation. CBT-based apps and mood monitoring features tend to be more effective. However, many studies have high risk of bias, particularly those by app developers. Sustained engagement is crucial for effectiveness. Apps can be useful tools but have limitations requiring continued research and improvement.
REFERENCES (9)
Share Report
Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media