Geneo Logo
Geneo
AI Visibility Report
12/15/2025
Live Analysis:
ChatGPT_

AI Visibility Report for
learningexperienceplatform(LXP)vsLMS

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

Free Report
No Signup
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
All 7 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
360Learning
0
2
Sentiment:
Score:95
Totara
0
2
Sentiment:
Score:95
Docebo
0
1
Sentiment:
Score:55
4Cornerstone OnDemand
0
1
Sentiment:
Score:55
5Valamis
0
1
Sentiment:
Score:55
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 16 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
#1ciphr.com faviconciphr.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
2
#2totara.com favicontotara.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#3360learning.com favicon360learning.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#4docebo.com favicondocebo.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
#5valamis.com faviconvalamis.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

3072 Characters

BRAND (7)

Docebo
Cornerstone OnDemand
360Learning
Totara
Valamis
Learningbank
CloudAssess

SUMMARY

Provides a structured educational overview defining LMS as a software application for administering, tracking, and delivering educational courses with strict oversight capabilities, particularly effective for compliance training and certification programs. Begins to contrast with LXP but the response appears incomplete.

Perplexity

3835 Characters

BRAND (7)

Docebo
Cornerstone OnDemand
360Learning
Totara
Valamis
Learningbank
CloudAssess

SUMMARY

Delivers a comprehensive analytical comparison starting with a concise summary, then diving into detailed differences between administrator-driven LMS systems focused on compliance and tracking versus learner-centric LXP systems emphasizing personalized, AI-driven learning experiences and social collaboration.

Google AIO

1655 Characters

BRAND (7)

Docebo
Cornerstone OnDemand
360Learning
Totara
Valamis
Learningbank
CloudAssess

SUMMARY

Offers an engaging comparative analysis using relatable analogies (TV schedule vs Netflix) to illustrate the fundamental control differences between top-down LMS and bottom-up LXP approaches, highlighting how modern systems often combine both methodologies for comprehensive learning solutions.

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

No specific brands were prominently featured across the platform responses, with all focusing on conceptual differences rather than vendor recommendations.

Platform Gap

Google AIO provides the most accessible explanation with analogies, while Perplexity offers the most structured analytical approach, and ChatGPT appears to have an incomplete response.

Link Opportunity

All platforms provide educational content without specific vendor bias, creating opportunities for LMS/LXP solution providers to establish thought leadership through comprehensive comparison guides.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

LMS systems are administrator-controlled and focus on compliance, tracking, and structured mandatory training delivery.

LXP platforms are learner-centric, emphasizing personalized content discovery, social learning, and self-directed development paths.

Modern learning ecosystems increasingly combine both LMS and LXP capabilities to provide comprehensive training solutions.

The fundamental difference lies in control structure: LMS pushes content to meet organizational needs while LXP empowers individual learner exploration.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media