Geneo Logo
Geneo

ISO 27001 vs NIST CSF mapping

informationalLegal & ComplianceAnalyzed 07/01/2025

AI Search Visibility Analysis

Analyze how brands appear across multiple AI search platforms for a specific prompt

Prompt Report Analysis Visualization
High Impact

Total Mentions

Total number of times a brand appears

across all AI platforms for this prompt

Reach

Platform Presence

Number of AI platforms where the brand

was mentioned for this prompt

Authority

Linkbacks

Number of times brand website was

linked in AI responses

Reputation

Sentiment

Overall emotional tone when brand is

mentioned (Positive/Neutral/Negative)

Brand Performance Across AI Platforms

3
Platforms Covered
5
Brands Found
0
Total Mentions
BRANDTOTAL MENTIONSPLATFORM PRESENCELINKBACKSSENTIMENTSCORE
1Sprinto
0
3
95
2CyberSaint
0
2
71
3Vanta
0
2
55
4Secureframe
0
2
55
5OneTrust
0
2
55
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 15 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
3
3
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
2
3
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

No specific brands are prominently recommended across the platforms, with focus on framework comparison rather than vendor solutions.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT provides structured educational content, Google AIO offers comparative analysis with practical considerations, while Perplexity delivers comprehensive technical mapping with specific overlap percentages.

Link Opportunity

Platforms reference various cybersecurity consulting firms and compliance platforms like CyberSaint, Vanta, OneTrust, and Sprinto for implementation guidance.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

ISO 27001 requires formal third-party certification while NIST CSF is voluntary and self-assessed

Organizations certified to ISO 27001 typically meet about 83% of NIST CSF requirements

Both frameworks emphasize risk-based approaches and can be effectively integrated together

NIST CSF is often used as a starting point, with ISO 27001 pursued later for formal certification

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

3662 Characters

SUMMARY

ISO 27001 and NIST CSF are both cybersecurity frameworks with different approaches. ISO 27001 is an international standard requiring formal certification through third-party audits, emphasizing risk-based Information Security Management Systems (ISMS). NIST CSF is a voluntary framework with six core functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover) offering flexible cybersecurity guidance. Key differences include certification requirements, structure (93 controls vs 106 subcategories), and technical depth. Organizations can map between frameworks to integrate both approaches, leveraging ISO 27001's structured certification and NIST CSF's flexible guidance for comprehensive cybersecurity coverage.

Perplexity

3712 Characters

BRAND (5)

Vanta
Sprinto
Secureframe
OneTrust
CyberSaint

SUMMARY

ISO 27001 and NIST CSF mapping shows significant overlap with 83% of NIST CSF requirements met by ISO 27001 certification, while NIST CSF covers 61% of ISO 27001 controls. Both use risk-based approaches covering access control, incident response, and asset management. Key differences: ISO 27001 is an international standard requiring formal third-party certification, while NIST CSF is voluntary guidance. ISO 27001 has 93 controls focused on ISMS establishment, NIST CSF has five core functions with technical depth. Organizations often start with NIST CSF for flexibility, then pursue ISO 27001 certification for formal validation, using both together for robust cybersecurity programs.

Google AIO

3082 Characters

BRAND (5)

Vanta
Sprinto
Secureframe
OneTrust
CyberSaint

SUMMARY

ISO 27001 is a globally recognized standard requiring external certification for Information Security Management Systems, while NIST CSF is a voluntary framework with five core functions providing flexible cybersecurity guidance. ISO 27001 emphasizes formal processes and is preferred by mature organizations, while NIST CSF suits organizations developing cybersecurity programs. Key differences include mandatory vs voluntary adoption, certification requirements, cost implications, and focus (process-oriented vs risk-based). The frameworks can be mapped together through crosswalk tables, allowing organizations to leverage strengths of both for comprehensive cybersecurity programs and streamlined risk management efforts.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media

ISO 27001 vs NIST CSF Mapping: Complete Framework Guide | Geneo