ISO 27001 vs NIST CSF mapping
AI Search Visibility Analysis
Analyze how brands appear across multiple AI search platforms for a specific prompt
Total Mentions
Total number of times a brand appears
across all AI platforms for this prompt
Platform Presence
Number of AI platforms where the brand
was mentioned for this prompt
Linkbacks
Number of times brand website was
linked in AI responses
Sentiment
Overall emotional tone when brand is
mentioned (Positive/Neutral/Negative)
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
| BRAND | TOTAL MENTIONS | PLATFORM PRESENCE | LINKBACKS | SENTIMENT | SCORE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1Cisco | 1 | 1 | 95 | ||
2NIST CSF | 3 | 0 | 83 | ||
3ISO 27001 | 3 | 0 | 83 | ||
4Censinet | 0 | 2 | 75 | ||
5CyberSaint | 1 | 1 | 71 | ||
6Vanta | 0 | 1 | 55 | ||
7Secureframe | 0 | 1 | 55 | ||
8Bright Defense | 0 | 1 | 55 | ||
9Sprinto | 0 | 1 | 55 | ||
10AuditBoard | 0 | 1 | 55 | ||
11onetrust | 0 | 1 | 55 | ||
12Scrut | 0 | 1 | 55 | ||
13ComplianceForge | 0 | 1 | 55 | ||
14Compliancy Group | 0 | 1 | 55 | ||
15IoT Security Institute | 0 | 1 | 55 | ||
16IT Governance USA | 0 | 1 | 55 | ||
17Ignyte Platform | 0 | 1 | 55 |
Strategic Insights & Recommendations
Dominant Brand
Both ISO 27001 and NIST CSF are equally referenced across platforms as the primary frameworks being compared, with no clear dominance of one over the other.
Platform Gap
ChatGPT provides foundational education, Google AIO focuses on practical implementation steps, while Perplexity offers the most structured comparative analysis with detailed similarities and differences.
Link Opportunity
Perplexity provides significantly more reference links (14) compared to ChatGPT (2) and Google AIO (3), indicating stronger source attribution and external resource connectivity.
Key Takeaways for This Prompt
All platforms agree that both frameworks use a risk-based approach to cybersecurity management.
The mapping between ISO 27001 and NIST CSF helps organizations reduce compliance redundancy and streamline security efforts.
ISO 27001 requires formal certification while NIST CSF provides voluntary guidelines, representing different implementation approaches.
Organizations benefit from understanding both frameworks' structures to create effective crosswalks and alignment strategies.
AI Search Engine Responses
Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query
ChatGPT
BRAND (17)
SUMMARY
Provides a foundational comparison between ISO/IEC 27001 and NIST CSF, explaining that both are cybersecurity frameworks with common objectives but different structures and applications. Emphasizes ISO 27001's formal certification requirements and risk-based ISMS approach, while describing NIST CSF as voluntary guidelines structured around core functions for preventing, detecting, and responding to cybersecurity risks.
Perplexity
BRAND (17)
SUMMARY
Offers a structured comparison highlighting both similarities and differences between the frameworks. Emphasizes their shared risk-based approach and comprehensive security coverage while presenting a detailed comparison table. Focuses on the practical aspects of how organizations can understand and implement both frameworks together.
REFERENCES (14)
Google AIO
BRAND (17)
SUMMARY
Focuses on the practical mapping process between ISO 27001 and NIST CSF, explaining how organizations can create crosswalks to align ISO's specific controls with NIST's five core functions. Emphasizes the benefits of streamlined security efforts, reduced redundancy, and simplified compliance through proper mapping of both frameworks' structures.
REFERENCES (3)
Share Report
Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media