Geneo Logo
Geneo

HDMI 2.2 vs DisplayPort 2.1 bandwidth

Analyzed across ChatGPT, Perplexity & Google AIO
Analyzed 11/15/2025

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

📨Report will be sent to your email within 1 minute

Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
All 18 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
HDMI
15
0
Sentiment:
Score:95
DisplayPort
15
0
Sentiment:
Score:95
Tom's Hardware
2
3
Sentiment:
Score:68
4PCWorld
2
1
Sentiment:
Score:61
5Anker
0
1
Sentiment:
Score:55
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 18 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
#1tomshardware.com favicontomshardware.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
3
#2av.com faviconav.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
#3vesa.org faviconvesa.org
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
#4anker.com faviconanker.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
#5geneo.app favicongeneo.app
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

1748 Characters

BRAND (19)

Anker
Geneo
精选行业Query
Cable Matters
Tom's Hardware
HDMI
DisplayPort
AV
Granite River Labs
Steam
Rtings
PCWorld
Plugable
VESA
CableTime
Silkland
AceMagic
TFTCentral
KabelDirekt

SUMMARY

Provides a structured technical comparison using a table format, highlighting that HDMI 2.2 offers 96 Gbps bandwidth versus DisplayPort 2.1's 80 Gbps. Focuses on maximum resolution capabilities up to 16K and various refresh rate combinations, with both standards supporting Display Stream Compression (DSC) for enhanced performance.

Perplexity

1704 Characters

BRAND (19)

Anker
Geneo
精选行业Query
Cable Matters
Tom's Hardware
HDMI
DisplayPort
AV
Granite River Labs
Steam
Rtings
PCWorld
Plugable
VESA
CableTime
Silkland
AceMagic
TFTCentral
KabelDirekt

SUMMARY

Delivers the most comprehensive analysis with detailed bandwidth specifications, including usable data rates and encoding efficiency considerations. Presents extensive refresh rate and resolution combinations for both standards, emphasizing HDMI 2.2's superior 96 Gbps bandwidth and providing specific technical details about DisplayPort 2.1's 77.37 Gbps usable rate.

Google AIO

466 Characters

BRAND (19)

Anker
Geneo
精选行业Query
Cable Matters
Tom's Hardware
HDMI
DisplayPort
AV
Granite River Labs
Steam
Rtings
PCWorld
Plugable
VESA
CableTime
Silkland
AceMagic
TFTCentral
KabelDirekt

SUMMARY

Offers a concise comparative overview emphasizing practical differences between the standards. Highlights HDMI 2.2's bandwidth advantage while noting DisplayPort 2.1's efficiency and preference in professional monitor and graphics card applications, providing context for real-world usage scenarios.

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

HDMI and DisplayPort are the dominant interface standards discussed across all platforms, with HDMI 2.2 consistently positioned as having superior bandwidth capabilities.

Platform Gap

Perplexity provides the most technical depth with 14 links, while Google AIO focuses on practical applications and ChatGPT offers structured comparison tables.

Link Opportunity

There's significant opportunity for cable manufacturers and display technology companies to provide authoritative content, as current responses rely heavily on technical specifications rather than product recommendations.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

HDMI 2.2's 96 Gbps bandwidth consistently outperforms DisplayPort 2.1's 80 Gbps across all platform responses.

All platforms agree on the high-end capabilities of both standards, supporting resolutions up to 16K and high refresh rates.

DisplayPort 2.1 is positioned as more efficient and preferred for professional applications despite lower raw bandwidth.

Both standards support Display Stream Compression (DSC) technology for enhanced performance optimization.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media