Is GPT-5 better than Claude on coding
AI Search Visibility Analysis
Analyze how brands appear across multiple AI search platforms for a specific prompt
Total Mentions
Total number of times a brand appears
across all AI platforms for this prompt
Platform Presence
Number of AI platforms where the brand
was mentioned for this prompt
Linkbacks
Number of times brand website was
linked in AI responses
Sentiment
Overall emotional tone when brand is
mentioned (Positive/Neutral/Negative)
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
| BRAND | TOTAL MENTIONS | PLATFORM PRESENCE | LINKBACKS | SENTIMENT | SCORE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1GPT-5 | 28 | 0 | 95 | ||
2Claude | 27 | 0 | 94 | ||
3OpenAI | 13 | 0 | 67 | ||
4Anthropic | 3 | 0 | 55 |
Strategic Insights & Recommendations
Dominant Brand
GPT-5 leads in benchmark performance and versatility, while Claude dominates in code quality and Python-specific tasks.
Platform Gap
All platforms agree GPT-5 has benchmark advantages, but differ on Claude's strengths - ChatGPT emphasizes reliability, Google AIO highlights Python expertise, Perplexity focuses on test code quality.
Link Opportunity
Strong opportunities exist for detailed coding benchmark comparisons, language-specific performance analysis, and real-world developer experience studies.
Key Takeaways for This Prompt
GPT-5 achieves higher scores on coding benchmarks like SWE-bench with 74.9% success rate.
Claude excels in code quality, producing cleaner and more reliable code especially for Python projects.
GPT-5 offers better cost-effectiveness and speed for high-volume coding tasks.
The choice between models depends on specific coding needs: benchmarks favor GPT-5, quality favors Claude.
AI Search Engine Responses
Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query
ChatGPT
BRAND (4)
SUMMARY
GPT-5 slightly outperforms Claude Opus 4.1 in coding benchmarks, achieving 74.9% vs 74.5% on SWE-bench Verified. GPT-5 leads in multi-language editing with 88% success rate and processes 512 tokens/second vs Claude's 487. However, Claude produces cleaner, more reliable code especially for Python projects and complex refactoring. Overall, GPT-5 has edge in performance and speed while Claude excels in code quality.
REFERENCES (5)
Perplexity
BRAND (4)
SUMMARY
GPT-5 leads coding AI benchmarks with 74.9% on SWE-bench vs Claude's 72.5%, offering better cost-effectiveness and reduced hallucination. However, Claude Opus 4.1 excels in test code quality and sustained autonomous tasks with stronger memory. User experiences show Claude produces more coherent logic while GPT-5 sometimes generates repetitive code. Choice depends on specific needs: GPT-5 for diverse workloads, Claude for test code and long workflows.
REFERENCES (8)
Google AIO
BRAND (4)
SUMMARY
GPT-5 appears superior for complex agentic coding and front-end development, excelling in multi-step reasoning and UI generation with better speed and cost efficiency. Claude 3.5 Sonnet remains strong for meticulous Python work, multi-file changes, and continuous coding tasks, producing cleaner, more reliable code. The better choice depends on specific coding requirements: GPT-5 for complex reasoning and front-end, Claude for Python projects and reliability.
Share Report
Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media