Geneo Logo
Geneo

gaming monitor refresh rate sweet spot

Analyzed across ChatGPT, Perplexity & Google AIO
Analyzed 10/16/2025

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

📨Report will be sent to your email within 1 minute

Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
All 10 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
Samsung
1
2
Sentiment:
Score:95
Anker
1
1
Sentiment:
Score:68
Intel
1
1
Sentiment:
Score:68
4Lenovo
0
1
Sentiment:
Score:57
5ViewSonic
0
1
Sentiment:
Score:57
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 8 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
#1samsung.com faviconsamsung.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
3
4
#2lenovo.com faviconlenovo.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
3
3
#3anker.com faviconanker.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1
#4intel.com faviconintel.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1
#5noping.com faviconnoping.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

2743 Characters

BRAND (10)

Anker
NVIDIA
AMD
Intel
Lenovo
Samsung
ViewSonic
NoPing
XoticPC
MMD Monitors

SUMMARY

Provides a structured breakdown of optimal refresh rates based on gaming preferences, recommending 60-120Hz for casual gamers and 144-200Hz as the sweet spot for most gamers. The response emphasizes the importance of matching refresh rate to system capabilities and gaming requirements, with specific mention of motion clarity and responsiveness benefits.

Perplexity

0 Characters

BRAND (10)

Anker
NVIDIA
AMD
Intel
Lenovo
Samsung
ViewSonic
NoPing
XoticPC
MMD Monitors

SUMMARY

No summary available.

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

Samsung is the only monitor brand specifically mentioned, appearing in ChatGPT's response with a reference link, while hardware brands like NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel are noted for system compatibility considerations.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT provides more detailed explanations with specific use cases and hardware considerations, while Google AIO offers a more concise recommendation with broader categorization of gaming styles.

Link Opportunity

Both platforms reference external sources for technical specifications and buying guides, indicating opportunities for monitor manufacturers and tech review sites to provide authoritative refresh rate guidance.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

144Hz emerges as the consensus sweet spot across both platforms for most gaming scenarios.

Both platforms emphasize matching refresh rate to system capabilities rather than simply choosing the highest available option.

Gaming style and competitive requirements are key factors in determining optimal refresh rate beyond the general sweet spot.

Cost-benefit analysis is highlighted as important, with diminishing returns at very high refresh rates for casual gaming.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media