Geneo Logo
Geneo

fast fashion vs sustainable clothing options

Analyzed across ChatGPT, Perplexity & Google AIO
Analyzed 08/09/2025

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

📨Report will be sent to your email within 1 minute

Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
All 3 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
H&M
1
0
Sentiment:
Score:75
Zara
1
0
Sentiment:
Score:75
SHEIN
1
0
Sentiment:
Score:75
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 29 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
#1ft.com faviconft.com
ChatGPT:
2
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
2
#2gofynd.com favicongofynd.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#3pomp.store faviconpomp.store
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#4limcollege.edu faviconlimcollege.edu
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#5carbontrail.net faviconcarbontrail.net
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
2

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

4054 Characters

BRAND (3)

H&M
Zara
SHEIN

SUMMARY

ChatGPT provides an educational overview contrasting fast fashion with sustainable clothing, specifically naming brands like H&M, Zara, and Shein as fast fashion examples. The response focuses on environmental statistics, highlighting that fast fashion accounts for 10% of global carbon emissions and 20% of wastewater production, with detailed examples like the 2,700 liters of water needed for a single cotton T-shirt. The platform emphasizes the environmental costs of synthetic fibers and microplastic pollution.

Perplexity

2387 Characters

BRAND (3)

H&M
Zara
SHEIN

SUMMARY

Perplexity delivers a structured comparative analysis clearly defining both fast fashion and sustainable fashion approaches. The response emphasizes the contrast between exploitative practices in fast fashion versus ethical responsibility in sustainable fashion. It highlights specific materials like organic cotton, TENCEL™, and recycled fibers as sustainable alternatives, while focusing on the environmental harm caused by cheap synthetic fibers, pollution, and unethical labor practices in fast fashion.

Google AIO

854 Characters

BRAND (3)

H&M
Zara
SHEIN

SUMMARY

Google AIO provides a comprehensive overview emphasizing the fundamental differences between fast fashion and sustainable clothing approaches. The response focuses on the benefits of sustainable clothing including reduced environmental impact, improved working conditions, higher quality products, support for local economies, and waste reduction. The platform presents a balanced view that helps consumers understand how their choices can contribute to environmental responsibility.

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

ChatGPT exclusively mentions major fast fashion brands (H&M, Zara, Shein) as examples, while other platforms avoid specific brand naming.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT provides specific environmental statistics and brand examples, Perplexity offers structured comparative analysis with material specifics, while Google AIO focuses on consumer benefits and decision-making guidance.

Link Opportunity

All platforms provide substantial link opportunities with Google AIO leading at 18 links, followed by ChatGPT's 9 links and Perplexity's 7 links.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

Only ChatGPT specifically names fast fashion brands, creating potential brand association risks for mentioned companies.

Perplexity provides the most technical detail about sustainable materials like TENCEL™ and organic cotton alternatives.

Google AIO emphasizes consumer empowerment and decision-making benefits rather than focusing on industry criticism.

All platforms agree on the environmental and social responsibility aspects but differ in their approach to presenting solutions.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media