cross-border remittance cost comparison
AI Search Visibility Analysis
Analyze how brands appear across multiple AI search platforms for a specific query
Total Mentions
Total number of times a brand appears
across all AI platforms for this query
Platform Presence
Number of AI platforms where the brand
was mentioned for this query
Linkbacks
Number of times brand website was
linked in AI responses
Sentiment
Overall emotional tone when brand is
mentioned (Positive/Neutral/Negative)
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
| BRAND | TOTAL MENTIONS | PLATFORM PRESENCE | LINKBACKS | SENTIMENT | SCORE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1Veem | 0 | 1 | 95 | ||
2Wise | 0 | 1 | 84 | ||
3Western Union | 0 | 0 | 72 | ||
4XE | 0 | 0 | 66 | ||
5OFX | 0 | 0 | 66 | ||
6MoneyGram | 0 | 0 | 55 |
Strategic Insights & Recommendations
Dominant Brand
Mobile money platforms and fintech solutions like Veem, XE, and OFX are emerging as the most cost-effective alternatives to traditional banks and money transfer operators.
Platform Gap
ChatGPT focuses on cryptocurrency solutions and general cost factors, Google AIO provides specific percentage comparisons across methods, while Perplexity offers the most comprehensive regional analysis and recent trends.
Link Opportunity
All platforms reference World Bank remittance data and GSMA mobile money surveys, creating opportunities for authoritative financial institutions and fintech companies to establish thought leadership.
Key Takeaways for This Query
Mobile money platforms offer the lowest remittance costs at 3.54% compared to banks at 11.8% and traditional MTOs at 5-6%.
Sub-Saharan Africa has the highest remittance costs globally, while South Asia and MENA regions offer the most affordable options.
Digital and fintech solutions consistently outperform traditional banking channels in both cost and transparency.
Over 55% of mobile money services now meet the UN SDG target of below 3% remittance costs, indicating significant progress toward affordable international transfers.
AI Search Engine Responses
Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query
ChatGPT
SUMMARY
Cross-border remittance costs vary significantly by method. Traditional banks and MTOs charge 5-7% on average, with Sub-Saharan Africa seeing fees up to 8.9%. Mobile money platforms offer the most cost-effective solution at 3.54% for $200 transfers, 44% lower than global averages. Cryptocurrency-based remittances can cost as low as 1%, potentially saving users $5 billion annually. Key factors affecting costs include exchange rate markups, intermediary fees, and regional variations. To minimize costs, users should compare providers, opt for digital platforms, consolidate transfers, and monitor exchange rates.
REFERENCES (7)
Perplexity
BRAND (3)
SUMMARY
Cross-border remittance costs vary significantly by method and region. Mobile money is now the most affordable option at 3.54% for $200 transfers, 44% lower than global averages and approaching the UN SDG target of below 3%. Money transfer operators charge 5.4-6.2%, while banks remain most expensive at 11.8%, reaching 16% in Africa. Regional disparities exist, with Sub-Saharan Africa having highest costs at 7.7% and South Asia/MENA lowest at 4.2-4.3%. Payment cards have become more cost-effective than mobile money for funding transfers in 2024. Digital innovation is steadily driving costs down worldwide.
REFERENCES (8)
Google AIO
BRAND (4)
SUMMARY
Cross-border remittance costs vary significantly by method, with banks being most expensive at 11.99% and mobile money cheapest at 4.35%. The global average is 6.39% of transaction amount. Money transfer operators average 5.4%, post offices 7.7%, and credit/debit cards 5.25%. Costs depend on transaction amount, specific corridors, service provider, and technology used. Digital methods like mobile money are generally cheaper than traditional methods. Hidden fees and exchange rate markups can significantly impact final amounts. Comparison tools and specialist providers like Veem, XE, and OFX often offer better rates than traditional banks.
REFERENCES (18)
Share Report
Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media