Geneo Logo
Geneo
AI Visibility Report
12/15/2025
Live Analysis:
ChatGPT_

AI Visibility Report for
creativefatiguedetectioninMetaads

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

Free Report
No Signup
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
All 4 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
Meta
26
0
Sentiment:
Score:95
Pixis
1
2
Sentiment:
Score:57
Madgicx
1
1
Sentiment:
Score:55
4Admetrics
0
2
Sentiment:
Score:55
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 18 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
#1pixis.ai faviconpixis.ai
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#2adshark.com faviconadshark.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#3admetrics.io faviconadmetrics.io
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#4motionapp.com faviconmotionapp.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#5adamigo.ai faviconadamigo.ai
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

2862 Characters

BRAND (4)

Meta
Pixis
Madgicx
Admetrics

SUMMARY

ChatGPT provides a structured educational overview of creative fatigue in Meta ads, explaining the concept as decreased engagement when audiences see the same ad repeatedly. The response focuses on Meta's built-in detection features, including pre-campaign warnings that predict fatigue within seven days and in-progress campaign alerts. The explanation emphasizes the importance of recognizing fatigue early to maintain optimal ad performance and cost efficiency.

Perplexity

5829 Characters

BRAND (4)

Meta
Pixis
Madgicx
Admetrics

SUMMARY

Perplexity delivers a technical definition combining Meta's automated detection systems with manual monitoring approaches. The response details specific Meta labels like "Creative fatigue" and "Creative limited" with precise thresholds (2x cost increase for fatigue detection). It emphasizes the integration of platform signals, metric-based monitoring including frequency and CTR trends, and third-party automation tools for comprehensive fatigue detection and quick creative refresh strategies.

Google AIO

1614 Characters

BRAND (4)

Meta
Pixis
Madgicx
Admetrics

SUMMARY

Google AIO offers a comprehensive practical guide covering both detection methods and key performance indicators. The response explains creative fatigue as audience overexposure leading to declining engagement and rising costs. It provides specific metrics to monitor including CTR decline, rising CPR, high frequency rates (3-4+ exposures), and falling conversion rates, while noting that Meta's built-in alerts are reactive rather than predictive.

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

Meta dominates all platform responses as the primary solution, with all platforms focusing exclusively on Meta's native detection tools and features.

Platform Gap

Perplexity provides the most technical depth with specific thresholds and mentions third-party tools, while ChatGPT and Google AIO focus primarily on Meta's native features.

Link Opportunity

There's a significant opportunity for third-party creative fatigue detection tools like Madgicx, Pixis, and Admetrics to gain visibility, as they're barely mentioned despite the clear need for advanced monitoring solutions.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

All platforms agree that creative fatigue occurs when audiences see ads too frequently, leading to decreased performance and increased costs.

Meta's built-in detection features are the primary focus across all responses, with labels like "Creative fatigue" and "Creative limited" being key indicators.

Manual monitoring of metrics like CTR, frequency, and cost per result is essential for early detection before Meta's reactive alerts trigger.

Third-party automation tools for creative fatigue detection represent an underexplored opportunity in the current AI platform coverage.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media