Geneo Logo
Geneo

creative fatigue detection in Meta ads

Analyzed across ChatGPT, Perplexity & Google AIO
Analyzed 10/16/2025

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

📨Report will be sent to your email within 1 minute

Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
All 8 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
Meta
3
0
Sentiment:
Score:95
Meta Ads Manager
3
0
Sentiment:
Score:95
Pixis
1
2
Sentiment:
Score:77
4AdAmigo
0
2
Sentiment:
Score:59
5AppsFlyer
0
2
Sentiment:
Score:59
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 14 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
#1pixis.ai faviconpixis.ai
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
2
#2adamigo.ai faviconadamigo.ai
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#3adshark.com faviconadshark.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#4appsflyer.com faviconappsflyer.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
#5growthjockey.com favicongrowthjockey.com
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

2607 Characters

BRAND (8)

Meta
Creatopy
AdAmigo
Pixis
AppsFlyer
Adshark
Meta Ads Manager
GrowthJockey

SUMMARY

Provides a structured educational overview of creative fatigue in Meta ads, explaining the concept and focusing on identification methods through Meta Ads Manager. Covers pre-campaign warnings and active campaign alerts, with emphasis on the "Creative Fatigue" label system. References external sources like Creatopy for additional context and mentions tools like Pixis for creative management.

Perplexity

3275 Characters

BRAND (8)

Meta
Creatopy
AdAmigo
Pixis
AppsFlyer
Adshark
Meta Ads Manager
GrowthJockey

SUMMARY

Delivers a comprehensive analysis with detailed performance signals and specific metrics for detecting creative fatigue. Emphasizes automatic detection through Meta's warning system while providing concrete thresholds (2-2.5x frequency) and key indicators like decreasing CTR, increasing frequency, and rising costs. Includes extensive source citations for credibility.

Google AIO

625 Characters

BRAND (8)

Meta
Creatopy
AdAmigo
Pixis
AppsFlyer
Adshark
Meta Ads Manager
GrowthJockey

SUMMARY

Offers a technical breakdown of Meta's automated detection system with specific warning labels and thresholds. Clearly distinguishes between "Creative limited" (less than 2x cost increase) and "Creative fatigue" (2x or more cost increase) warnings. Focuses on both automatic and manual detection methods with structured presentation of key metrics.

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

Meta and Meta Ads Manager dominate all platform responses as the primary tools for creative fatigue detection, with minimal mention of third-party solutions.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT provides broader educational context while Google AIO focuses on technical specifications and Perplexity offers the most comprehensive metric analysis.

Link Opportunity

All platforms heavily rely on Meta's native tools, creating opportunities for third-party creative fatigue detection and management solutions to gain visibility.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

All platforms emphasize Meta's built-in detection system as the primary method for identifying creative fatigue.

Technical thresholds vary in detail across platforms, with Google AIO providing the most specific cost increase metrics.

Perplexity offers the most actionable metrics like the 2-2.5x frequency threshold for engagement drops.

Third-party tools like Creatopy and Pixis receive minimal coverage despite their relevance to creative management.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media