Geneo Logo
Geneo
AI Visibility Report
12/15/2025
Live Analysis:
ChatGPT_

AI Visibility Report for
copyrightissuesAI-generatedimagespublishing

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

Free Report
No Signup
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
All 5 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
Disney
6
0
Sentiment:
Score:95
Google
5
0
Sentiment:
Score:75
Warner Bros.
2
0
Sentiment:
Score:63
4Midjourney
3
0
Sentiment:
Score:59
5Stable Diffusion
1
0
Sentiment:
Score:55
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 11 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
#1apnews.com faviconapnews.com
ChatGPT:
2
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
2
#2copyright.gov faviconcopyright.gov
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
2
Google AIO:
0
2
#3kr.law faviconkr.law
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
#4ncsl.org faviconncsl.org
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
#5axios.com faviconaxios.com
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

2910 Characters

BRAND (5)

Google
Midjourney
Stable Diffusion
Disney
Warner Bros.

SUMMARY

ChatGPT provides an educational overview of AI-generated image copyright issues, focusing on the U.S. Copyright Office's March 2023 guidance that works created solely by AI without human intervention are not eligible for copyright protection. The response uses the "Zarya of the Dawn" comic book case as a key example, explaining how the text and arrangement were protected while the AI-generated images themselves were not. The platform emphasizes the legal boundaries and recent developments in this evolving area of intellectual property law.

Perplexity

2897 Characters

BRAND (5)

Google
Midjourney
Stable Diffusion
Disney
Warner Bros.

SUMMARY

Perplexity delivers a more analytical and structured response, clearly stating that AI-generated images without meaningful human input cannot receive copyright protection in the US. The platform provides a comprehensive analysis including references to the US Copyright Office's 2025 Report and discusses both the risks of publishing such images and the potential for copyright protection when substantial human authorship is involved. The response is more technical and includes specific legal citations and numbered references.

Google AIO

0 Characters

BRAND (5)

Google
Midjourney
Stable Diffusion
Disney
Warner Bros.

SUMMARY

No summary available.

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

Disney appears most prominently across platforms with 6 mentions on ChatGPT, while other AI platforms like Midjourney and Stable Diffusion receive minimal coverage.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT provides a more accessible educational approach while Perplexity offers deeper analytical coverage with extensive citations and legal references.

Link Opportunity

Both platforms heavily reference legal sources and copyright office guidance, creating opportunities for authoritative legal content and case study analysis.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

AI-generated images without human authorship cannot receive copyright protection under current U.S. law.

The "Zarya of the Dawn" case serves as a landmark example for understanding AI copyright boundaries.

Publishing AI-generated images carries risks if the AI was trained on copyrighted works without permission.

Human creativity and substantial authorship remain essential requirements for copyright protection of AI-assisted works.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media