Amazon FBA vs FBM profitability
AI Search Visibility Analysis
Analyze how brands appear across multiple AI search platforms for a specific query
Total Mentions
Total number of times a brand appears
across all AI platforms for this query
Platform Presence
Number of AI platforms where the brand
was mentioned for this query
Linkbacks
Number of times brand website was
linked in AI responses
Sentiment
Overall emotional tone when brand is
mentioned (Positive/Neutral/Negative)
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
| BRAND | TOTAL MENTIONS | PLATFORM PRESENCE | LINKBACKS | SENTIMENT | SCORE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1Amazon | 0 | 1 | 95 | ||
2Jungle Scout | 0 | 2 | 55 |
Strategic Insights & Recommendations
Dominant Brand
Amazon dominates the discussion as the primary platform, with FBA and FBM being Amazon's own fulfillment models rather than competing brands.
Platform Gap
ChatGPT focuses on detailed cost breakdowns, Google AIO emphasizes strategic considerations, while Perplexity provides the most comprehensive data on actual seller performance metrics.
Link Opportunity
All platforms could benefit from linking to Amazon's official FBA calculator tools and seller resources for practical cost analysis.
Key Takeaways for This Query
FBM sellers show higher revenue performance with 28% earning over $25K monthly compared to 12% of FBA sellers
FBA works best for small, lightweight, high-turnover products that benefit from Prime eligibility
FBM is more profitable for bulky, heavy, or slow-moving items due to lower storage and fulfillment costs
Many successful sellers adopt a hybrid approach using both FBA and FBM based on product characteristics
AI Search Engine Responses
Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query
ChatGPT
BRAND (1)
SUMMARY
ChatGPT provides a detailed cost breakdown comparing FBA and FBM. FBA charges fulfillment fees ($3.22-$5.42) and storage fees ($0.75-$2.40/cubic foot), while FBM involves warehousing ($8-$15/sq ft), labor ($15-$20/hour), and shipping costs. Key insight: 28% of FBM sellers earn over $25K monthly vs 12% of FBA sellers, though 35% of FBA sellers achieve 20%+ profit margins compared to 38% for FBM. FBA suits small, high-turnover products with Prime eligibility benefits, while FBM works better for bulky, heavy, or slow-moving items with greater operational control.
Perplexity
BRAND (2)
SUMMARY
Perplexity provides comprehensive data showing FBM sellers generally achieve higher profitability: 28% earn over $25K monthly vs 12% of FBA sellers, and 38% have 20%+ margins vs 35% for FBA. FBM works better for large, bulky, or slow-moving products, avoiding FBA's storage and fulfillment fees. FBA excels for high-demand, fast-selling items with Prime benefits boosting sales. Many sellers use a hybrid approach, with FBA for small fast-movers and FBM for large or specialized products. Success depends on product characteristics, sales velocity, and logistics capabilities.
REFERENCES (8)
Google AIO
BRAND (2)
SUMMARY
Google AIO emphasizes that both models can be profitable depending on strategy and product type. FBA benefits include reduced workload, Prime eligibility, and higher sales potential, but comes with storage and fulfillment fees that can reduce margins. FBM offers higher profit margins by avoiding FBA fees and provides more control over fulfillment, but requires managing all logistics. The choice depends on product type, volume, shipping costs, inventory management capabilities, and growth goals. A hybrid approach is often recommended.
REFERENCES (27)
Share Report
Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media