Geneo Logo
Geneo

AI tutor effectiveness studies

informationalEducation & Online LearningAnalyzed 07/01/2025

AI Search Visibility Analysis

Analyze how brands appear across multiple AI search platforms for a specific prompt

Prompt Report Analysis Visualization
High Impact

Total Mentions

Total number of times a brand appears

across all AI platforms for this prompt

Reach

Platform Presence

Number of AI platforms where the brand

was mentioned for this prompt

Authority

Linkbacks

Number of times brand website was

linked in AI responses

Reputation

Sentiment

Overall emotional tone when brand is

mentioned (Positive/Neutral/Negative)

Brand Performance Across AI Platforms

3
Platforms Covered
5
Brands Found
15
Total Mentions
BRANDTOTAL MENTIONSPLATFORM PRESENCELINKBACKSSENTIMENTSCORE
1Harvard University
7
1
95
2Wharton School
3
0
58
3Rori
2
0
57
4University of Pennsylvania
2
0
56
5Stanford
1
0
55
Referenced Domains Analysis
All 20 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt
ChatGPT
Perplexity
Google AIO
ChatGPT:
2
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
2
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
2
2
ChatGPT:
2
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
2
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
1
2
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
1
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1
ChatGPT:
1
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
0
1
ChatGPT:
0
Perplexity:
0
Google AIO:
1
1

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

Harvard University and Stanford emerge as leading research institutions demonstrating AI tutor effectiveness with significant learning gains.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT provides balanced coverage of both positive and negative findings, while Google AIO emphasizes caution and Perplexity focuses heavily on positive outcomes.

Link Opportunity

Educational institutions and AI tutoring platforms could benefit from linking to these comprehensive research findings to support their effectiveness claims.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

AI tutors can double learning gains compared to traditional classroom instruction when properly designed and implemented.

Personalized feedback and self-paced learning environments are key factors in AI tutor success across multiple studies.

Over-reliance on AI tutors may hinder deep learning and critical thinking skill development, requiring balanced implementation.

Combining AI tutors with human instruction creates optimal learning environments that leverage both technological efficiency and human emotional intelligence.

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

3032 Characters

BRAND (3)

Harvard University
Wharton School
Rori

SUMMARY

Recent studies show mixed but promising results for AI tutors. Harvard's physics course study found students using AI tutors achieved double the learning gains of traditional classroom peers. A Ghanaian study with AI tutor Rori showed significant math improvements with 0.37 effect size. Medical education research demonstrated AI tutors' effectiveness in surgical skills training. However, a Wharton study revealed potential drawbacks, with students using AI for math prep performing worse on actual tests, suggesting over-reliance risks. Educators perceive AI tutors as superior in engagement and empathy but emphasize careful implementation to ensure essential skill development.

Perplexity

4194 Characters

BRAND (2)

Harvard University
Stanford

SUMMARY

Multiple studies demonstrate AI tutors' high effectiveness in improving learning outcomes when designed with sound pedagogical principles. Harvard's study found students using AI tutor 'PS2 Pal' achieved more than twice the learning gains with effect sizes of 0.73-1.3. Students reported higher engagement (4.1/5 vs 3.6/5) and motivation. Stanford research showed AI-assisted tutoring raised math pass rates by 9 percentage points. AI tutors excel at personalization, immediate feedback, and maintaining supportive tones. 73% of Harvard students found AI tutoring helpful, citing patience and non-judgmental nature. Combining AI with human tutors creates synergy for scalable, quality education.

Google AIO

2575 Characters

BRAND (2)

Harvard University
University of Pennsylvania

SUMMARY

AI tutors demonstrate significant promise in enhancing learning outcomes through personalized learning and increased efficiency. Studies show AI tutors can double learning gains compared to traditional methods while providing tailored feedback and support. However, concerns exist about over-reliance potentially hindering critical thinking development. Harvard research showed doubled learning gains, while University of Pennsylvania studies revealed negative impacts when students became overly dependent. Human instructors still excel in emotional intelligence and adaptability. Ethical considerations including data privacy and bias must be addressed for responsible implementation.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media