AI in radiology accuracy statistics
AI Search Visibility Analysis
Analyze how brands appear across multiple AI search platforms for a specific prompt
Total Mentions
Total number of times a brand appears
across all AI platforms for this prompt
Platform Presence
Number of AI platforms where the brand
was mentioned for this prompt
Linkbacks
Number of times brand website was
linked in AI responses
Sentiment
Overall emotional tone when brand is
mentioned (Positive/Neutral/Negative)
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
| BRAND | TOTAL MENTIONS | PLATFORM PRESENCE | LINKBACKS | SENTIMENT | SCORE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1ChestLink | 1 | 0 | 75 |
Strategic Insights & Recommendations
Dominant Brand
No specific AI brands were prominently featured across the responses, with focus on general AI system performance rather than particular vendors.
Platform Gap
ChatGPT provided broader coverage of multiple radiology applications while Perplexity focused more on specific accuracy statistics and bias risks, with Google AIO providing no content.
Link Opportunity
Strong opportunities exist for linking to medical journals, research institutions, and AI radiology companies given the extensive citation of PubMed and academic sources.
Key Takeaways for This Prompt
AI demonstrates superior sensitivity rates in chest X-ray analysis with 99.1% accuracy compared to 72.3% for human radiologists.
AI assistance significantly reduces diagnostic time from over 2 minutes to under 40 seconds while maintaining accuracy.
AI bias poses serious risks, potentially reducing experienced radiologist accuracy from 82% to 45.5% in mammography when given incorrect suggestions.
Performance varies widely based on individual clinician factors and AI tool quality, requiring rigorous validation before clinical deployment.
AI Search Engine Responses
Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query
ChatGPT
SUMMARY
AI in radiology demonstrates impressive accuracy matching or surpassing human radiologists in specific tasks. Key findings include 67.7% sensitivity for lung nodule detection in complex cases, 96.1% for nodule presence detection, 71.5% sensitivity for cervical spine fractures, and 63.7% sensitivity for breast cancer screening. AI assistance reduces assessment time from 2:44 to 35.7 seconds while increasing diagnostic confidence. However, AI bias can reduce diagnostic accuracy from 73% to 61.7%, highlighting the need for careful implementation and validation.
REFERENCES (5)
Perplexity
BRAND (1)
SUMMARY
AI in radiology shows significant accuracy improvements with 99.1% sensitivity for abnormal chest X-rays versus 72.3% for radiologists, and 99.8% sensitivity for critical abnormal X-rays versus 93.5% for radiologists. In prostate MRI, AI increases AUC and specificity by 3.3-3.4%. However, AI bias poses risks - experienced radiologists' mammography accuracy dropped from 82% to 45.5% when misled by incorrect AI suggestions. Performance varies widely depending on individual clinician factors and AI tool quality, requiring careful validation before deployment.
REFERENCES (5)
Google AIO
SUMMARY
No summary available.
Share Report
Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media