AI-generated content copyright issues

Analyzed across ChatGPT, Perplexity & Google AIO

Analyzed 11/15/2025

Are you in the answers when your customers ask AI?

Enter your prompt and find out which brands dominate AI search results.

Brand Performance Across AI Platforms

All 7 brands referenced across AI platforms for this prompt

Midjourney

Sentiment:

Score:95

Studio Ghibli

Sentiment:

Score:85

Coda

Sentiment:

Score:65

4Google Books

Sentiment:

Score:65

5Universal

Sentiment:

Score:55

Referenced Domains Analysis

All 22 domains referenced across AI platforms for this prompt

ChatGPT

Perplexity

Google AIO

apnews.com

ChatGPT:2

Perplexity:0

Google AIO:0

forbes.com

ChatGPT:0

Perplexity:0

Google AIO:2

youtube.com

ChatGPT:0

Perplexity:0

Google AIO:2

congress.gov

ChatGPT:0

Perplexity:1

Google AIO:1

ChatGPT:0

Perplexity:2

Google AIO:0

AI Search Engine Responses

Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query

ChatGPT

4744 Characters

BRAND (8)

精选行业Query

Midjourney

Universal

Coda

Disney

Studio Ghibli

Warner Bros.

Google Books

SUMMARY

ChatGPT provides an educational overview of AI-generated content copyright challenges, emphasizing that traditional copyright law requires human authorship. The response uses the "Zarya of the Dawn" case study involving Midjourney to illustrate how AI-generated illustrations lack copyright protection while human-arranged elements retain protection. The platform focuses on explaining current legal stances and the necessity of human intervention for copyright eligibility.

REFERENCES (7)

https://apnews.com/article/722b1b892192e7e1628f7ae5da8cc427?utm_source=openai

https://apnews.com/article/b87d80d7b4a4dfdcf0ee149d30830551?utm_source=openai

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_AI_Copyright_Disclosure_Act?utm_source=openai

https://www.arnoldporter.com/-/media/files/perspectives/publications/2023/11/advisory--as-ai-proliferates-courts-are-tasked-with-copyright-issues-published-in-law360-103123.pdf?hash=28899E7F223149B7CFD725311ABA4889&rev=4737141dc69146d3a98e2b9be7124113&utm_source=openai

https://www.gamesradar.com/entertainment/animation-movies/japanese-content-trade-group-whose-membership-includes-studio-ghibli-calls-for-its-work-to-stop-being-used-to-train-ai-without-permission/?utm_source=openai

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/culture/article/2025/07/12/at-rencontres-d-arles-the-artistic-blur-between-ai-and-photographers-remains-unresolved_6743296_30.html?utm_source=openai

https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2023/03/copyright-office-issues-guidance-on-ai-generated-works?utm_source=openai

Perplexity

4230 Characters

BRAND (8)

精选行业Query

Midjourney

Universal

Coda

Disney

Studio Ghibli

Warner Bros.

Google Books

SUMMARY

Perplexity delivers a comprehensive analysis structured with clear headings, definitively stating that purely AI-generated works cannot be copyrighted in the United States due to human authorship requirements. The response emphasizes that AI-created content exists as unowned material available for public use, while noting that copyright protection may apply when humans exercise sufficient creative control over AI output.

REFERENCES (10)

https://builtin.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-copyright

https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sulr_supra/34/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence_and_copyright

https://guides.lib.usf.edu/AI/copyright

https://issues.org/generative-ai-copyright-law-crawford-schultz/

https://sites.usc.edu/iptls/2025/02/04/ai-copyright-and-the-law-the-ongoing-battle-over-intellectual-property-rights/

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB10922

https://www.copyright.gov/ai/

https://www.dykema.com/news-insights/the-future-of-creativity-us-copyright-office-clarifies-copyrightability-of-ai-generated-works.html

Google AIO

589 Characters

BRAND (8)

精选行业Query

Midjourney

Universal

Coda

Disney

Studio Ghibli

Warner Bros.

Google Books

SUMMARY

Google AIO provides a concise analytical summary covering key copyright issues including the non-copyrightability of purely AI-generated work and the legal complexities of using copyrighted material for AI training. The response emphasizes the importance of human creative control and modification for copyright protection, while acknowledging that ongoing litigation will continue shaping the legal landscape.

REFERENCES (13)

https://dig.watch/updates/a-new-chapter-in-intellectual-property-rights-the-age-of-ai-generated-content

https://guides.lib.usf.edu/AI/copyright

https://sites.usc.edu/iptls/2025/02/04/ai-copyright-and-the-law-the-ongoing-battle-over-intellectual-property-rights/

https://truyo.com/who-owns-ai-generated-content-the-copyright-battle-over-machine-made-creations/

https://venturebeat.com/ai/u-s-copyright-office-says-ai-generated-content-can-be-copyrighted-if-a-human-contributes-to-or-edits-it

https://www.bakerdonelson.com/the-fast-moving-race-between-gen-ai-and-copyright-law

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB10922

https://www.forbes.com/sites/douglaslaney/2025/02/11/copyright-or-copywrong-ais-intellectual-property-paradox/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/johannacostigan/2024/02/20/ip-protection-could-be-low-hanging-fruit-for-us-china-ai-cooperation/

https://www.innoventlaw.com/ai-generated-content-copyright/

https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-magazine/articles/us-copyright-office-on-ai-human-creativity-still-matters-legally-73696

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeLX5eJBNj8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sjqayly7RX4&t=177

Strategic Insights & Recommendations

Dominant Brand

Midjourney is the only AI tool specifically mentioned across platforms, appearing prominently in ChatGPT's case study example.

Platform Gap

ChatGPT provides detailed case studies and examples, Perplexity offers structured comprehensive analysis, while Google AIO delivers concise analytical points with broader legal context.

Link Opportunity

All platforms provide substantial link opportunities with ChatGPT offering 7 links, Google AIO providing 13 links, and Perplexity including 10 links for further legal research.

Key Takeaways for This Prompt

All platforms consistently agree that purely AI-generated content cannot receive copyright protection due to human authorship requirements.

Human creative control and intervention are essential factors for any copyright protection of AI-assisted content.

The legal landscape remains evolving with ongoing litigation and regulatory developments shaping future copyright frameworks.

ChatGPT uniquely leverages specific case studies like "Zarya of the Dawn" to illustrate complex legal principles in practical contexts.

Share Report

Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media