AI food recognition nutrition tracker reviews
AI Search Visibility Analysis
Analyze how brands appear across multiple AI search platforms for a specific prompt
Total Mentions
Total number of times a brand appears
across all AI platforms for this prompt
Platform Presence
Number of AI platforms where the brand
was mentioned for this prompt
Linkbacks
Number of times brand website was
linked in AI responses
Sentiment
Overall emotional tone when brand is
mentioned (Positive/Neutral/Negative)
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
| BRAND | TOTAL MENTIONS | PLATFORM PRESENCE | LINKBACKS | SENTIMENT | SCORE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1MyNetDiary | 6 | 0 | 95 | ||
2MyFitnessPal | 5 | 0 | 90 | ||
3Cal AI | 5 | 0 | 90 | ||
4Nutritimo | 4 | 1 | 78 | ||
5SnapCalorie | 4 | 0 | 72 | ||
6CalorieGram | 4 | 0 | 72 | ||
7NutriScan | 2 | 1 | 68 | ||
8WeightWatchers | 3 | 0 | 67 | ||
9Optimeal | 3 | 0 | 67 | ||
10NutriCapture | 3 | 0 | 67 | ||
11Healthify | 3 | 0 | 67 | ||
12Carb Manager | 2 | 0 | 62 | ||
13CalBye | 1 | 0 | 57 | ||
14Fastic | 1 | 0 | 55 |
Strategic Insights & Recommendations
Dominant Brand
MyFitnessPal emerges as the most frequently mentioned and established brand across all platforms, with consistent recognition for its extensive database and accuracy.
Platform Gap
ChatGPT focuses on newer, lesser-known apps while Google AIO and Perplexity emphasize established players like MyFitnessPal and MyNetDiary.
Link Opportunity
Strong opportunities exist for AI nutrition tracking app developers to create content addressing accuracy concerns and comparative feature analysis.
Key Takeaways for This Prompt
AI food recognition accuracy ranges from 92-97% across top apps, with newer technology showing promising improvements.
Photo-based meal logging significantly reduces manual input time compared to traditional nutrition tracking methods.
Subscription models are common among premium features, with costs ranging from $3.33 to $19.99 per month.
Accuracy limitations still exist for complex mixed dishes, lighting conditions, and portion size estimation.
AI Search Engine Responses
Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query
ChatGPT
BRAND (5)
SUMMARY
ChatGPT provides comprehensive reviews of AI food recognition nutrition trackers including Nutritimo, Optimeal, CalorieGram, NutriCapture, and Healthify. The response highlights key features like photo-based meal logging, personalized nutrition advice, and barcode scanning. It notes user testimonials praising accuracy and convenience, while also addressing limitations identified by University of Sydney research regarding AI accuracy in food recognition and caloric estimation.
REFERENCES (6)
Perplexity
BRAND (7)
SUMMARY
Perplexity offers an analytical review of AI food recognition nutrition trackers, focusing on accuracy rates (92-97%), ease of use benefits, and health impact studies. The response evaluates top apps including Cal AI, MyNetDiary, WeightWatchers, and CalBye, discussing their strengths, limitations, and subscription models. It emphasizes scientific validation and real-world performance data from peer-reviewed studies.
REFERENCES (10)
Google AIO
BRAND (6)
SUMMARY
Google AIO presents a detailed comparative analysis of AI nutrition tracking apps in table format, covering MyFitnessPal, MyNetDiary, SnapCalorie, NutriScan, Cal AI, and Carb Manager. The response includes accuracy percentages, pricing, key features, and specific use cases. It addresses AI limitations like lighting dependency and portion estimation challenges while providing tailored recommendations for different user needs.
Share Report
Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media