Best Practices for Brand Safety in AI Search (2025)

Enterprise — Image Source: statics.mylandingpages.co

If you manage a brand in 2025, AI search is now a first‑touch channel you don’t fully control. Google’s AI Overviews have produced odd, sometimes harmful answers (from satirical “glue on pizza” citations to a bug that told users it was 2024), which Google acknowledged and moved to fix, highlighting the need for ongoing safeguards according to Google’s own update in 2024 and the May 2025 bug fix coverage by Google’s AI Overviews quality update (2024) and TechCrunch on the 2025 bug fix. Trust is fragile: the Reuters Institute’s 2024 survey found audiences are wary of AI‑generated news, and Pew’s April 2025 report shows low confidence in institutional AI safeguards, underscoring the reputational stakes for brands, as seen in Reuters Institute 2024 attitudes to AI in journalism and Pew Research 2025 report on U.S. public and experts.

What follows is a field‑tested playbook: concrete steps to harden your owned content against misinterpretation, monitor AI answers in real time, and respond when things go wrong. Throughout, we’ll show where Geneo—an AI search visibility platform—slots into the workflow.

1) Know the failure modes (and where they surface)

Common AI search risks you must plan for:

Hallucinations and outdated facts: LLMs can produce plausible but false claims or surface stale information. Columbia Journalism Review’s 2024 comparison of AI search engines highlights recurring citation and accuracy gaps across systems in CJR’s evaluation of eight AI search engines (2024).
Misattribution and missing context: Your brand may be conflated with a competitor’s product, or safety warnings are omitted in summaries.
Toxicity/defamation: Answers can echo harmful user‑generated content.
Unsafe advice: Especially for YMYL categories (health, finance, safety).

Where it happens most:

Google AI Overviews: Summaries plus source tiles; not claim‑by‑claim citations.
ChatGPT/ChatGPT Search: Inline links when browsing/search is enabled; source depth varies.
Perplexity: Typically multiple citations, but quality control still varies per query as outlined in Zapier’s 2024 comparison of Perplexity vs. ChatGPT and Google’s high‑level disclosures about how Gemini powers Overviews in Google I/O 2025 keynote notes.

Implication: Your program must combine content hardening with cross‑platform monitoring and a rapid incident workflow.

2) Harden your content so AI gets it right

These controls reduce misinterpretation and increase correct inclusion:

Elevate E‑E‑A‑T signals on sensitive pages: Expert authorship, clear sourcing, updated timestamps, and transparent editorial standards. Google has repeatedly emphasized E‑E‑A‑T and policy compliance for high‑quality results; see Google’s structured data policies for related guidance.
Use JSON‑LD structured data precisely: Implement schema types (Organization, Product, FAQPage, HowTo, Review, Article) and validate in the Rich Results Test. Start with Google’s intro to structured data.
Answer real user questions directly: Create concise Q&A sections for brand queries (pricing, safety, compatibility, returns). Even though some rich results were de‑emphasized, clear semantics help LLM grounding, as covered in Ahrefs’ AI Overviews guide (2024).
Close data voids proactively: Identify niche, brand‑sensitive queries where low‑quality sources dominate and publish authoritative, cited answers. Google’s 2024 note on “odd” Overviews referenced data voids and safeguards in Google’s 2024 AI Overviews update.
Maintain canonical, up‑to‑date pages: Version your specs, safety notices, recalls, and comparison pages; link to primary evidence.
Strengthen citation‑worthiness: Publish primary data (test results, certifications), endorsements from recognized authorities, and cite standards.

Foundational checks you can implement in a week:

Ownership: Assign an owner for each top‑risk page.
Schema: Add Organization + Product schema to product lines; validate daily until error‑free.
Q&A: Add a “Top questions” block for each high‑risk intent.
Review cadence: Set a 90‑day review for YMYL content; 180‑day for others.

3) Build a monitoring architecture (Geneo‑enabled)

Your objective is to detect harmful or incorrect AI answers before they spread.

Track priority queries across platforms: Configure monitoring for brand, product, exec names, safety topics, recalls, and competitor comparisons. Establish critical, high, and medium tiers.
Establish sentiment baselines and thresholds: For example, alert if negative sentiment crosses a −0.6 score or flips from positive to negative week‑over‑week.
Correlate changes with content updates and news: Tie spikes to press, recalls, or social chatter.

How Geneo helps operationalize this:

Cross‑platform visibility: Geneo tracks brand mentions, citations, and exposure across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews in one place, with multi‑brand support for agencies and enterprise portfolios.
AI sentiment analysis: Detect shifts in tonal framing of your brand in AI answers; identify negative drivers and recurring claims.
Historical query tracking: Pinpoint when a harmful claim first appeared, whether it’s isolated or propagating, and compare before/after remediation.
Content optimization suggestions: Use recommendations to strengthen E‑E‑A‑T and structured data where AI answers underperform.

Team setup:

Funnel alerts into Slack/Teams; route Critical to PR/legal immediately.
Define MTTD targets (e.g., <4 hours for Critical; <24 hours for High).
Instrument on‑call rotations for PR/SEO and a weekly review for trends.

4) Incident response playbook (90‑minute sprint for Critical)

When Geneo flags a Critical incident:

Confirm and scope (10 minutes)

Validate the claim via Geneo screenshots and history. Check if issue appears on multiple platforms or locales.

Stabilize owned surfaces (20 minutes)

Update or publish an authoritative clarification page (FAQ or product notice) with citations and structured data.
Add a short, plain‑language summary and link it from relevant pages.

File platform feedback (20 minutes)

Google AI Overviews: Use the “Send feedback” link on the SERP and include authoritative citations; also reference your updated page. See Google’s help center and AI principles for context in Google’s Search Help/AI Principles and AI Principles overview.
ChatGPT/ChatGPT Search: Provide in‑product feedback and, for publisher issues, contact the channel noted for publishers in OpenAI’s ChatGPT publisher feedback channel and consult OpenAI usage policies.
Perplexity: Use in‑app feedback/support per their terms in Perplexity’s Terms of Service. Include corrected citations.

Escalate externally if needed (15 minutes)

If harm is severe (safety, defamation), coordinate a public clarification via newsroom/social and notify partners.

Track and verify resolution (25 minutes)

Monitor Geneo for the answer update; capture before/after, log MTTR, and annotate actions.
If unresolved within your SLA, escalate again with additional evidence.

5) Control how AI crawlers interact with your site (with trade‑offs)

AI search quality improves when your best content is crawlable, but you may need to throttle or block certain bots.

OpenAI GPTBot: Official guidance indicates it respects robots.txt. See OpenAI’s GPTBot page. Example to block entirely:

User-agent: GPTBot
    Disallow: /

PerplexityBot: Per documentation, it respects robots.txt, though there have been industry concerns about undeclared crawlers. Review your logs and consider selective allowances. See PerplexityBot documentation and Cloudflare’s investigation in Cloudflare’s 2024 blog on stealth crawling.
Google and Google‑Extended: Manage with standard robots directives and headers; align with your SEO strategy. Reference Google’s robots meta and X‑Robots‑Tag docs.
Page‑level controls: If you need nuanced rules, favor X‑Robots‑Tag headers for PDFs or media.
Network‑level controls: Cloudflare’s AI Crawl Control adds granularity and potential licensing routes; see Cloudflare’s AI Crawl Control (2024).

Trade‑offs:

Blocking may reduce your presence in AI answers; allowlist high‑value sections while protecting sensitive or frequently misused content.

6) Red‑team your content for AI robustness

Before launch of major campaigns or docs, run adversarial tests:

Prompt‑injection and jailbreak checks; toxicity and defamation probes.
“Confusable brand” tests (similar names, competitor swaps), outdated‑info prompts, and speculative claims.
Document test cases, screenshots, and fixes.

Useful frameworks and references:

Map/manage risks with NIST AI RMF’s functions; a practical profile is summarized in Berkeley CLTC’s AI RMF profile (v1.1).
Operationalize controls with ISO/IEC 42001 and 23894; see the 2025 summary in Cloud Security Alliance’s regulatory overview.
Guardrails/design patterns for GenAI apps are discussed in AWS’s guidance for responsible gen AI.

7) Measurement that executives will fund

Track these leading indicators and outcomes:

MTTD/MTTR for harmful answers by severity.
Sentiment accuracy and distribution in AI answers referencing your brand.
Share of authoritative citations in AI answers (e.g., percent from .gov/.edu/industry standards).
Visibility share in AI Overviews/Perplexity results (presence and frequency of your owned domain as a cited source).
Escalation effectiveness: percent of incidents resolved within SLA.

External context to shape targets:

Brand safety programs reduce violations: a 2024 benchmark showed stabilized suitability violations around single‑digit rates with strong pre‑bid controls, per DoubleVerify’s 2024 Global Insights report. While that’s advertising, the operational lesson applies—prevention beats reaction.
AI Overviews prevalence and impact on visibility has increased through 2025, requiring proactive inclusion strategies; see Xponent21’s 2025 analysis on AI SEO visibility shifts.

How Geneo supports KPI rigor:

Dashboards for sentiment trendlines, cross‑platform visibility, and incident logs.
Historical comparisons to demonstrate MTTR improvement post‑playbook.
Multi‑brand roll‑ups for agencies or holding companies.

8) Roles, SLAs, and governance for multi‑brand teams

Assign clear owners and decision rights:

SEO lead: Structured data quality, inclusion strategy.
PR/comms: Public clarifications and crisis messaging.
Legal/compliance: Risk classification, defamation thresholds, regulatory review.
Product/CS: Accurate specs, safety notices, recalls.

Suggested SLAs:

Critical harm: MTTD <4 hours; MTTR <24 hours.
High severity: MTTD <24 hours; MTTR <3 business days.
Medium: Review in weekly triage.

Operating model:

Central governance sets taxonomy and playbooks; brand units execute locally.
Use Geneo’s multi‑brand management to standardize tracking, permissions, and benchmarks.

9) What won’t work (and how to adapt)

Waiting for platforms to fix themselves: None publish SLAs for corrections; responsiveness varies.
Over‑reliance on disallowing crawlers: You’ll reduce harm but also lose positive inclusion.
One‑and‑done content fixes: Models refresh and answers drift; schedule ongoing reviews.
Ignoring regional differences: Legal thresholds and platform behavior vary; localize playbooks.

Quick start checklist (save for your runbook)

[ ] Inventory top 50 risk queries by brand and locale; tier by severity.
[ ] Implement Organization/Product schema; validate daily for 2 weeks.
[ ] Add Q&A sections to top 20 pages; address known data voids.
[ ] Deploy Geneo for cross‑platform monitoring, sentiment, and history; wire alerts to PR/legal.
[ ] Define Critical/High/Medium thresholds; staff an on‑call rotation.
[ ] Prepare a correction page template; pre‑approve by legal.
[ ] Document platform feedback steps; store links and evidence kit.
[ ] Set KPI targets: MTTD/MTTR, sentiment accuracy, citation authority share, visibility share.
[ ] Run a quarterly red‑team focused on defamation, toxicity, and outdated facts.

—

Geneo can help you operationalize this playbook today with multi‑platform AI visibility tracking, sentiment analysis, and historical monitoring—so you catch issues early, correct faster, and prove impact. Explore the platform and start a free trial at https://geneo.app.