scalable MQTT broker for industrial IoT deployment
AI Search Visibility Analysis
Analyze how brands appear across multiple AI search platforms for a specific prompt
Total Mentions
Total number of times a brand appears
across all AI platforms for this prompt
Platform Presence
Number of AI platforms where the brand
was mentioned for this prompt
Linkbacks
Number of times brand website was
linked in AI responses
Sentiment
Overall emotional tone when brand is
mentioned (Positive/Neutral/Negative)
Brand Performance Across AI Platforms
| BRAND | TOTAL MENTIONS | PLATFORM PRESENCE | LINKBACKS | SENTIMENT | SCORE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1EMQX | 0 | 11 | 95 | ||
2HiveMQ | 0 | 8 | 86 | ||
3FlowFuse | 0 | 1 | 58 | ||
4Integration Objects | 0 | 1 | 58 | ||
5Open Automation Software | 0 | 1 | 58 | ||
6NanoMQ | 0 | 0 | 57 | ||
7Mosquitto | 0 | 0 | 56 | ||
8VerneMQ | 0 | 0 | 55 |
Strategic Insights & Recommendations
Dominant Brand
EMQX emerges as the most frequently recommended brand across all platforms for its exceptional scalability and open-source flexibility.
Platform Gap
ChatGPT focuses on specific product features and integrations, while Google AIO emphasizes selection criteria and Perplexity provides detailed technical comparisons.
Link Opportunity
There's an opportunity to create comprehensive comparison guides and implementation tutorials for industrial MQTT broker deployments.
Key Takeaways for This Prompt
EMQX and HiveMQ are the leading choices for large-scale industrial IoT MQTT broker deployments.
Scalability requirements vary significantly between edge computing and cloud-based industrial IoT implementations.
Enterprise features like clustering, high availability, and security are critical for mission-critical industrial applications.
Open-source solutions like EMQX offer cost advantages while commercial solutions like HiveMQ provide enterprise support and reliability guarantees.
AI Search Engine Responses
Compare how different AI search engines respond to this query
ChatGPT
BRAND (4)
SUMMARY
ChatGPT recommends four enterprise-grade MQTT brokers for industrial IoT: HiveMQ for mission-critical operations with 99.999% uptime, EMQX for handling millions of concurrent connections with 100+ industrial protocol support, MQTT Universal Broker by Integration Objects for secure multi-protocol data exchange, and OAS MQTT Broker for flexible connectivity with various data sources including Modbus and Allen Bradley PLCs.
REFERENCES (4)
Perplexity
BRAND (5)
SUMMARY
Perplexity provides a detailed comparison table between EMQX and HiveMQ, highlighting EMQX's ability to handle millions of messages per second and 100+ million clients, while HiveMQ offers enterprise-grade reliability with 99.999% uptime. It notes EMQX as the most scalable open-source option and HiveMQ as the preferred commercial solution for Fortune 500 companies, with additional mention of FlowFuse for industrial data management.
REFERENCES (8)
Google AIO
BRAND (5)
SUMMARY
Google AIO emphasizes EMQX as the top choice for scalable industrial IoT, alongside HiveMQ and VerneMQ for large deployments. It highlights key selection criteria including scalability, performance, reliability, and security. For smaller deployments or edge computing, NanoMQ and Mosquitto are recommended as lightweight alternatives with specific considerations for unified namespace architecture and cloud deployment options.
REFERENCES (21)
Share Report
Share this AI visibility analysis report with others through social media